Anita Ashton

1.6k total citations
8 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Anita Ashton is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Anita Ashton has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cancer Research, 3 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Anita Ashton's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper). Anita Ashton is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper). Anita Ashton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Anita Ashton's co-authors include Judith M. Bliss, John Yarnold, Joanne Haviland, Janis Homewood, Søren M. Bentzen, Jane Hanson, Roger Owen, John R. Owen, J. Regan and C. Bush and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet Oncology, British Journal of Cancer and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

Anita Ashton

8 papers receiving 976 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anita Ashton United Kingdom	8	804	435	348	324	296	8	1.0k
Roger Owen United Kingdom	11	578 0.7×	248 0.6×	372 1.1×	206 0.6×	262 0.9×	11	897
Mark Gittleman United States	18	820 1.0×	288 0.7×	200 0.6×	437 1.3×	244 0.8×	32	1.1k
Yarnold United Kingdom	2	803 1.0×	381 0.9×	285 0.8×	316 1.0×	366 1.2×	3	986
Jane Pettinga United States	16	911 1.1×	230 0.5×	139 0.4×	532 1.6×	363 1.2×	31	1.1k
Philip Meijnen Netherlands	12	961 1.2×	238 0.5×	209 0.6×	661 2.0×	404 1.4×	21	1.2k
Boon Chua Australia	21	934 1.2×	135 0.3×	172 0.5×	555 1.7×	486 1.6×	57	1.2k
Howard C. Snider United States	16	1.1k 1.4×	227 0.5×	154 0.4×	783 2.4×	394 1.3×	29	1.4k
Hosam A. Kader Canada	15	730 0.9×	229 0.5×	139 0.4×	471 1.5×	268 0.9×	20	965
P. Fenoglietto France	18	345 0.4×	505 1.2×	327 0.9×	98 0.3×	268 0.9×	63	1.0k
Stella Lymberis United States	14	409 0.5×	301 0.7×	206 0.6×	104 0.3×	200 0.7×	49	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Anita Ashton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anita Ashton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anita Ashton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anita Ashton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anita Ashton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anita Ashton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anita Ashton. The network helps show where Anita Ashton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anita Ashton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anita Ashton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anita Ashton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anita Ashton. Anita Ashton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Gujral, Dorothy M., G. Sumo, John R. Owen, et al.. (2010). Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Relapse: Local Recurrence Versus New Primary Tumor and the Effect of Whole-Breast Radiotherapy on the Rate of New Primaries. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 79(1). 19–25. 34 indexed citations

Jenkins, Peter, et al.. (2009). A phase II trial of induction chemotherapy followed by continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 93(3). 396–401. 10 indexed citations

Haviland, Joanne, Anita Ashton, Lone Gothard, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of a Method for Grading Late Photographic Change in Breast Appearance after Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer. Clinical Oncology. 20(7). 497–501. 23 indexed citations

Owen, John R., Anita Ashton, Judith M. Bliss, et al.. (2006). Effect of radiotherapy fraction size on tumour control in patients with early-stage breast cancer after local tumour excision: long-term results of a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology. 7(6). 467–471. 422 indexed citations

Yarnold, John, Anita Ashton, Judith M. Bliss, et al.. (2005). Fractionation sensitivity and dose response of late adverse effects in the breast after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: long-term results of a randomised trial. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 75(1). 9–17. 370 indexed citations

Owen, John R., et al.. (2003). 19 Fractionation sensitivity of breast cancer. Results of a randomised trial. European Journal of Cancer Supplements. 1(5). S9–S9. 7 indexed citations

Peacock, John, Anita Ashton, Judith M. Bliss, et al.. (2000). Cellular radiosensitivity and complication risk after curative radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 55(2). 173–178. 96 indexed citations

Seal, S., J. Regan, Nadine Collins, et al.. (1998). Heterozygosity for mutations in the ataxia telangiectasia gene is not a major cause of radiotherapy complications in breast cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer. 78(7). 922–927. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact