Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
PlanetLab
2003675 citationsAndy Bavier, Larry Peterson et al.ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Reviewprofile →
Container-based operating system virtualization
2007463 citationsMarc E. Fiuczynski, Andy Bavier et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Andy Bavier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andy Bavier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andy Bavier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andy Bavier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andy Bavier. The network helps show where Andy Bavier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andy Bavier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andy Bavier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andy Bavier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andy Bavier. Andy Bavier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peterson, Larry, Scott Baker, Marc De Leenheer, et al.. (2015). XoS. 23–30.23 indexed citations
Zhu, Yaping, Andy Bavier, Nick Feamster, Sampath Rangarajan, & Jennifer Rexford. (2008). UFO. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 38(5). 59–62.14 indexed citations
7.
Bavier, Andy, Nick Feamster, Mark Huang, Larry Peterson, & Jennifer Rexford. (2006). In VINI veritas. 3–14.137 indexed citations
8.
Peterson, Larry, Andy Bavier, Marc E. Fiuczynski, & Steve Muir. (2006). Experiences building PlanetLab. Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 351–366.141 indexed citations
9.
Spring, Neil, Larry Peterson, Andy Bavier, & Vivek S. Pai. (2006). Using PlanetLab for network research. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. 40(1). 17–24.110 indexed citations
Nakao, Akihiro, Larry Peterson, & Andy Bavier. (2006). Scalable routing overlay networks. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. 40(1). 49–61.34 indexed citations
12.
Spring, Neil, Larry Peterson, Andy Bavier, & Vivek S. Pai. (2005). Using PlanetLab for network research: myths, realities, and best practices. 67–72.18 indexed citations
Bavier, Andy, Thiemo Voigt, Mike Wawrzoniak, Larry Peterson, & Per Gunningberg. (2001). SILK: Scout Paths in the Linux Kernel. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).20 indexed citations
16.
Bavier, Andy, Scott Karlin, Larry Peterson, & Xiaohu Qie. (2000). Scheduling Computations on a Programmable Router.3 indexed citations
17.
Bavier, Andy & Larry Peterson. (2000). The Power of Virtual Time for Multimedia Scheduling.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.