Andrew Williams

3.7k total citations
137 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

Andrew Williams is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Williams has authored 137 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 116 papers in Organic Chemistry, 50 papers in Molecular Biology and 41 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Andrew Williams's work include Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (79 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (25 papers) and Organic and Inorganic Chemical Reactions (20 papers). Andrew Williams is often cited by papers focused on Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (79 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (25 papers) and Organic and Inorganic Chemical Reactions (20 papers). Andrew Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Andrew Williams's co-authors include W. C. L. Ford, Salem A. Basaif, Ajay Luthra, Kenneth T. Douglas, Ibrahim T. Ibrahim, Sergio Thea, A. M. Davis, Jonathan M. J. Williams, Giuseppe Guanti and Eric J. Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Chemical Society Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Williams

132 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Williams United Kingdom 30 2.0k 1.2k 499 491 286 137 3.0k
Stig Allenmark Sweden 34 853 0.4× 1.1k 1.0× 1.9k 3.9× 122 0.2× 12 0.0× 151 3.5k
Josef Fried United States 32 1.1k 0.6× 1.3k 1.1× 233 0.5× 40 0.1× 33 0.1× 130 3.1k
O. Brede Germany 29 1.3k 0.6× 376 0.3× 187 0.4× 1.1k 2.2× 18 0.1× 150 2.6k
Christopher J. Easton Australia 36 2.4k 1.2× 1.8k 1.5× 885 1.8× 347 0.7× 13 0.0× 230 4.7k
Ryusei Konaka Japan 19 393 0.2× 264 0.2× 132 0.3× 135 0.3× 61 0.2× 43 1.4k
Gustavo A. Echeverría Argentina 22 796 0.4× 229 0.2× 100 0.2× 209 0.4× 42 0.1× 152 1.6k
Richard D. Gandour United States 27 1.0k 0.5× 1.1k 1.0× 520 1.0× 242 0.5× 8 0.0× 144 2.7k
K. Darrell Berlin United States 28 1.5k 0.7× 950 0.8× 239 0.5× 97 0.2× 24 0.1× 268 2.8k
Roger H. Bisby United Kingdom 28 685 0.3× 891 0.7× 116 0.2× 200 0.4× 10 0.0× 90 2.3k
José P. Cerón‐Carrasco Spain 30 609 0.3× 1.2k 1.0× 288 0.6× 335 0.7× 5 0.0× 107 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Williams. The network helps show where Andrew Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Williams. Andrew Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burris, Kevin D., et al.. (2019). Development of an Electrophysiological Assay for Kv7 Modulators on IonWorks Barracuda. Assay and Drug Development Technologies. 17(7). 310–321. 2 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Andrew, et al.. (2015). Altmetrics, huh?. Human Reproduction. 31(1). 1–1. 2 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Andrew, et al.. (2014). Experimental and theoretical study of the mechanism of hydrolysis of substituted phenyl hexanoates catalysed by globin in the presence of surfactant. Journal of Molecular Modeling. 20(3). 2096–2096. 3 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Andrew, et al.. (2005). Relationship between reactive oxygen species production and lipid peroxidation in human sperm suspensions and their association with sperm function. Fertility and Sterility. 83(4). 929–936. 46 indexed citations
5.
Lönnberg, Harri, Roger Strömberg, & Andrew Williams. (2004). Compelling evidence for a stepwise mechanism of the alkaline cyclisation of uridine 3′-phosphate esters. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2(15). 2165–2167. 57 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Andrew & W. C. L. Ford. (2004). Functional Significance of the Pentose Phosphate Pathway and Glutathione Reductase in the Antioxidant Defenses of Human Sperm1. Biology of Reproduction. 71(4). 1309–1316. 69 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Andrew, et al.. (2003). Reaction of imidazole with toluene-4-sulfonate salts of substituted phenyl N-methylpyridinium-4-carboxylate esters: special base catalysis by imidazole. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 1(11). 1995–1995. 1 indexed citations
8.
Štěrba, V., et al.. (2002). The base-catalysed cyclisation of phenyl N-(2-hydroxybenzyl)-N-methylcarbamates is concerted. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 1(2). 415–421. 4 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Andrew & W. C. L. Ford. (2001). The Role of Glucose in Supporting Motility and Capacitation in Human Spermatozoa. Journal of Andrology. 22(4). 680–695. 229 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Andrew, et al.. (1996). Tin(IV)-functionalised polymer supports; non-toxic and practical reagents for regioselective acetylation of sucrose. Carbohydrate Research. 283. 17–25. 12 indexed citations
12.
Thomas, Eric J. & Andrew Williams. (1995). Development of a synthesis of lankacidins: stereoselective synthesis of the δ-lactone fragment. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1. 351–358. 15 indexed citations
13.
Evans, David J., et al.. (1993). Aminolysis of phenyl esters by microgel and dendrimer molecules possessing primary amines. Journal of Molecular Catalysis. 85(1). 21–32. 11 indexed citations
14.
Al‐Awadi, Nouria A. & Andrew Williams. (1990). Effective charge development in ester hydrolysis catalyzed by cationic micelles. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 55(7). 2001–2004. 12 indexed citations
15.
Davis, A. M., Andrew C. Regan, & Andrew Williams. (1988). Experimental charge measurement at leaving oxygen in the bovine ribonuclease. A catalyzed cyclization of uridine 3'-phosphate aryl esters. Biochemistry. 27(25). 9042–9047. 23 indexed citations
16.
Williams, Andrew, et al.. (1985). Single transition state for sulfonato group (SO3) transfer between pyridine nucleophiles. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 107(14). 4327–4331. 22 indexed citations
17.
Williams, Andrew, et al.. (1984). The E1cB mechanism for thiocarbamate ester hydrolysis: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 2. 1827–1827. 10 indexed citations
18.
Day, R. A., et al.. (1979). Elimination–addition mechanisms of acyl group transfer: transcarbamoylation in aminoalkylimidazoles carbamoylated on the heterocyclic nitrogen. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 2. 1153–1159. 2 indexed citations
20.
Loran, John S., Richard Naylor, & Andrew Williams. (1976). Direct N-methylation of 2-pyridylphosphonic acids by diazomethane. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 2. 1444–1444. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026