Andrew Thorns
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 2%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nigel SykesFliss EM MurtaghJohn EllershawThomas OsborneM. S. RidoutBen KennedyDavid M. WardS A Smith
- Topics
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers)Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineRadiological and Ultrasound Technology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Andrew Thorns
10 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 432
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 156
- General Health Professions 152
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 151
- Clinical Psychology 112
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Thorns
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Thorns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Thorns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Thorns more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Thorns
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Thorns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Thorns. The network helps show where Andrew Thorns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Thorns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Thorns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Thorns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Thorns. Andrew Thorns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 190 | |
| 7 | 243 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 0 |
About Andrew Thorns
Andrew Thorns is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Emergency Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (156 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (93 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (80 citations). Andrew Thorns has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nigel Sykes, Fliss EM Murtagh, John Ellershaw, Thomas Osborne, M. S. Ridout, Ben Kennedy, David M. Ward and S A Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet Oncology, Cancer Treatment Reviews and Palliative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.