Andrew J. Portis

2.9k total citations
51 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Andrew J. Portis is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew J. Portis has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 19 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 11 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Andrew J. Portis's work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (24 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (19 papers) and Renal cell carcinoma treatment (10 papers). Andrew J. Portis is often cited by papers focused on Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (24 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (19 papers) and Renal cell carcinoma treatment (10 papers). Andrew J. Portis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Egypt. Andrew J. Portis's co-authors include Ralph V. Clayman, Arieh L. Shalhav, Elspeth M. McDougall, ABDELHAMID M. ELBAHNASY, Matthew D. Dunn, Chandru P. Sundaram, Jaime Landman, Cássio Andreoni, Donald D. Fentie and Peter Barrett and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Urology, American Journal of Kidney Diseases and Urology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew J. Portis

49 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew J. Portis United States 25 1.5k 833 728 419 311 51 2.1k
Shimon Meretyk Israel 22 1.9k 1.3× 1.0k 1.2× 1.2k 1.7× 396 0.9× 531 1.7× 52 2.7k
Henry Irving United Kingdom 28 1.1k 0.7× 542 0.7× 1.1k 1.5× 341 0.8× 269 0.9× 71 2.0k
Jihad H. Kaouk United States 27 1.6k 1.0× 2.1k 2.5× 722 1.0× 457 1.1× 375 1.2× 68 3.1k
Abbas Basiri Iran 24 1.4k 0.9× 505 0.6× 1.0k 1.4× 196 0.5× 289 0.9× 135 2.1k
John C. Hulbert United States 23 997 0.7× 445 0.5× 565 0.8× 313 0.7× 191 0.6× 61 1.6k
Larry C. Munch United States 25 1.4k 0.9× 408 0.5× 958 1.3× 195 0.5× 126 0.4× 44 1.9k
Bijan Shekarriz United States 26 1.0k 0.7× 686 0.8× 463 0.6× 234 0.6× 207 0.7× 58 1.9k
James O. L’Esperance United States 25 1.2k 0.8× 466 0.6× 435 0.6× 265 0.6× 291 0.9× 66 1.6k
David M. Hoenig United States 24 1.5k 1.0× 603 0.7× 1.0k 1.4× 213 0.5× 451 1.5× 107 2.1k
Anup P. Ramani United States 18 1.4k 1.0× 684 0.8× 301 0.4× 680 1.6× 80 0.3× 46 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Portis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Portis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Portis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Portis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Portis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Portis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Portis. The network helps show where Andrew J. Portis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew J. Portis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew J. Portis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew J. Portis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew J. Portis. Andrew J. Portis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Portis, Andrew J., et al.. (2019). MP12-06 REDUCING OPIATE USE IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE RENAL COLIC. The Journal of Urology. 201(Supplement 4).
2.
Portis, Andrew J., et al.. (2018). MP02-18 NON-NARCOTIC EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OF RENAL COLIC IMPROVES LENGTH OF STAY AND DISCHARGE RATE. The Journal of Urology. 199(4S). 1 indexed citations
3.
Portis, Andrew J., et al.. (2015). Repeat Surgery After Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy With Attempted Complete Extraction of Fragments: Long-term Follow-up. Urology. 85(6). 1272–1278. 13 indexed citations
4.
Portis, Andrew J., et al.. (2015). Unsuccessful Medical Expulsive Therapy: A Cost to Waiting?. Urology. 87. 25–32. 9 indexed citations
5.
Portis, Andrew J., et al.. (2014). Retreatment After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Computed Tomographic Era: Long-term Follow-up. Urology. 84(2). 279–284. 27 indexed citations
6.
Portis, Andrew J., et al.. (2010). High prevalence of gouty arthritis among the Hmong population in Minnesota. Arthritis Care & Research. 62(10). 1386–1391. 24 indexed citations
7.
Tatman, Penny, et al.. (2010). 1899 LONG-TERM RETREATMENT AFTER URETEROSCOPIC LASER LITHOTRIPSY DEPENDS ON EFFECTIVENESS OF INITIAL FRAGMENT CLEARANCE. The Journal of Urology. 183(4S). 1 indexed citations
9.
Portis, Andrew J., et al.. (2003). Matched Pair Analysis of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Effectiveness for Comparison of Lithotriptors. The Journal of Urology. 58–62. 3 indexed citations
10.
Andreoni, Cássio, Ephrem O. Olweny, Andrew J. Portis, et al.. (2002). Effect of Single-Dose Subarachnoid Spinal Anesthesia on Pain and Recovery after Unilateral Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology. 16(10). 721–725. 32 indexed citations
11.
Portis, Andrew J. & Chandru P. Sundaram. (2001). Diagnosis and initial management of kidney stones.. PubMed. 63(7). 1329–38. 81 indexed citations
12.
Dunn, Matthew D., Andrew J. Portis, C.K. Naughton, et al.. (2001). LAPAROSCOPIC CYST MARSUPIALIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE. The Journal of Urology. 165(6 Part 1). 1888–1892. 14 indexed citations
13.
Dunn, Matthew D., et al.. (2001). LAPAROSCOPIC CYST MARSUPIALIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT POLYCYSTIC KIDNEY DISEASE. The Journal of Urology. 1888–1892. 6 indexed citations
14.
Portis, Andrew J., Mohamed M. El Nady, & Ralph V. Clayman. (2001). Laparoscopic Radical/Total Nephrectomy: A Decade of Progress. Journal of Endourology. 15(4). 345–354. 35 indexed citations
15.
Dunn, Matthew D., Andrew J. Portis, Yan Yan, et al.. (2000). Clinical Effectiveness of New Stent Design: Randomized Single-Blind Comparison of Tail and Double-Pigtail Stents. Journal of Endourology. 14(2). 195–202. 87 indexed citations
16.
Dunn, Matthew D., Andrew J. Portis, ABDELHAMID M. ELBAHNASY, et al.. (2000). Laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with end-stage renal disease and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 35(4). 720–725. 85 indexed citations
17.
Shalhav, Arieh L., Andrew J. Portis, Elspeth M. McDougall, Manoj Patel, & Ralph V. Clayman. (2000). LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHROURETERECTOMY. Urologic Clinics of North America. 27(4). 761–773. 34 indexed citations
18.
Teichman, Joel M.H., et al.. (2000). IN VITRO COMPARISON OF SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY MACHINES. The Journal of Urology. 164(4). 1259–1264. 50 indexed citations
19.
Olweny, Ephrem O., Andrew J. Portis, JOSE S. AFANE, et al.. (2000). FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF 3 UNIQUE URETERAL STENTS:: INVESTIGATION OF A POISEUILLE FLOW PATTERN. The Journal of Urology. 164(6). 2099–2103. 20 indexed citations
20.
Dunn, Matthew D., Andrew J. Portis, Arieh L. Shalhav, et al.. (1999). LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMOR. The Journal of Urology. 166–166. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026