Andrew J. Piefer

852 total citations
10 papers, 652 citations indexed

About

Andrew J. Piefer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Virology and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew J. Piefer has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 652 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Virology and 3 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Andrew J. Piefer's work include HIV Research and Treatment (3 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers). Andrew J. Piefer is often cited by papers focused on HIV Research and Treatment (3 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers). Andrew J. Piefer collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Andrew J. Piefer's co-authors include Jacqueline D. Reeves, Paul Bates, Andrew J. Rennekamp, Sean M. Amberg, Graham Simmons, Estela Pineda‐Molina, Winfríed Weissenhorn, Hassan Belrhali, Colleen B. Jonsson and Tan Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Virology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew J. Piefer

9 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew J. Piefer United States 6 446 156 126 101 78 10 652
Mark A. Clementz United States 8 533 1.2× 293 1.9× 128 1.0× 303 3.0× 97 1.2× 10 895
Narcı́s Saubi Spain 17 419 0.9× 214 1.4× 204 1.6× 147 1.5× 307 3.9× 42 952
Eddie G. te Lintelo Netherlands 8 392 0.9× 161 1.0× 226 1.8× 13 0.1× 106 1.4× 8 623
Lisa A. Lopez United States 9 331 0.7× 150 1.0× 76 0.6× 277 2.7× 240 3.1× 11 671
Subodh Kumar Samrat United States 13 220 0.5× 156 1.0× 34 0.3× 34 0.3× 87 1.1× 24 507
Sudip Khadka United States 7 310 0.7× 252 1.6× 36 0.3× 131 1.3× 159 2.0× 15 829
Joseph P. Klaus United States 5 645 1.4× 195 1.3× 169 1.3× 10 0.1× 64 0.8× 6 828
Amornrat O’Brien United States 12 495 1.1× 165 1.1× 186 1.5× 11 0.1× 77 1.0× 20 731
Chelsea Pinkham United States 16 319 0.7× 189 1.2× 26 0.2× 54 0.5× 88 1.1× 24 581
Nicole R. Sexton United States 12 477 1.1× 116 0.7× 183 1.5× 17 0.2× 61 0.8× 18 639

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew J. Piefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew J. Piefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew J. Piefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew J. Piefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew J. Piefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew J. Piefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew J. Piefer. The network helps show where Andrew J. Piefer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew J. Piefer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew J. Piefer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew J. Piefer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew J. Piefer. Andrew J. Piefer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Piefer, Andrew J., et al.. (2020). Exploring Protein‐Protein Interactions for MS2‐L Lysis Activity. The FASEB Journal. 34(S1). 1–1. 1 indexed citations
2.
Allen, Mary E., et al.. (2019). Characterization of Microbial Communities Populating the Inflorescences of Humulus lupulus L.. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists. 77(4). 243–250. 8 indexed citations
3.
Allen, Mary E., et al.. (2019). Do Lactic Acid Bacteria produce antifungal bacteriocins?. The FASEB Journal. 33(S1). 1 indexed citations
5.
Pineda‐Molina, Estela, et al.. (2006). The Crystal Structure of the C‐Terminal Domain of Vps28 Reveals a Conserved Surface Required for Vps20 Recruitment. Traffic. 7(8). 1007–1016. 50 indexed citations
6.
Reeves, Jacqueline D. & Andrew J. Piefer. (2005). Emerging Drug Targets for Antiretroviral Therapy. Drugs. 65(13). 1747–1766. 94 indexed citations
7.
Simmons, Graham, Jacqueline D. Reeves, Andrew J. Rennekamp, et al.. (2004). Characterization of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike glycoprotein-mediated viral entry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101(12). 4240–4245. 441 indexed citations
8.
Piefer, Andrew J., et al.. (2003). Equine Infectious Anemia Virus Utilizes Host Vesicular Protein Sorting Machinery during Particle Release. Journal of Virology. 77(15). 8440–8447. 46 indexed citations
9.
Piefer, Andrew J. & Colleen B. Jonsson. (2002). A comparative study of the human T-cell leukemia virus type 2 integrase expressed in and purified from Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris. Protein Expression and Purification. 25(2). 291–299. 4 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Tan, Andrew J. Piefer, & Colleen B. Jonsson. (2001). Interactions of the Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type-II Integrase with the Conserved CA in the Retroviral Long Terminal Repeat End. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276(18). 14710–14717. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026