Andrew Foreman

2.9k total citations
75 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Andrew Foreman is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Foreman has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Otorhinolaryngology, 43 papers in Surgery and 15 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Foreman's work include Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (29 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (25 papers) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (23 papers). Andrew Foreman is often cited by papers focused on Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (29 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (25 papers) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (23 papers). Andrew Foreman collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Andrew Foreman's co-authors include Peter‐John Wormald, Alkis J. Psaltis, Deepti Singhal, Sam Boase, Joshua Jervis‐Bardy, Lor Wai Tan, Jerrold Weiss, Yvette Weinrauch, Peter Elsbach and Lorwai Tan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Anesthesiology.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Foreman

72 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Foreman Australia 22 1.4k 741 499 312 289 75 2.2k
Kristi Biswas New Zealand 22 801 0.6× 329 0.4× 424 0.8× 179 0.6× 248 0.9× 64 1.6k
Nithin D. Adappa United States 24 831 0.6× 998 1.3× 180 0.4× 241 0.8× 215 0.7× 140 2.0k
Yuichi Kurono Japan 27 588 0.4× 417 0.6× 198 0.4× 704 2.3× 510 1.8× 184 2.8k
Brecht Steelant Belgium 20 363 0.3× 269 0.4× 304 0.6× 790 2.5× 398 1.4× 52 2.0k
Lorwai Tan Australia 14 363 0.3× 180 0.2× 205 0.4× 120 0.4× 56 0.2× 18 803
Itaru Moro Japan 27 67 0.0× 289 0.4× 489 1.0× 76 0.2× 130 0.4× 118 2.2k
Fiona J. Radcliff New Zealand 19 107 0.1× 351 0.5× 358 0.7× 41 0.1× 108 0.4× 47 1.3k
Richard S. Berk United States 22 237 0.2× 176 0.2× 464 0.9× 30 0.1× 281 1.0× 50 1.5k
Yaping Pan China 33 166 0.1× 139 0.2× 925 1.9× 24 0.1× 233 0.8× 127 3.0k
Stefanie Eyerich Germany 28 103 0.1× 164 0.2× 276 0.6× 616 2.0× 91 0.3× 59 3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Foreman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Foreman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Foreman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Foreman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Foreman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Foreman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Foreman. The network helps show where Andrew Foreman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Foreman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Foreman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Foreman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Foreman. Andrew Foreman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Foreman, Andrew, et al.. (2024). The effectiveness of fibrin sealants in head and neck surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews. 13(1). 246–246. 2 indexed citations
2.
3.
Krishnan, Suren, et al.. (2024). Is transoral robotic surgery useful as a salvage technique in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta analysis. Head & Neck. 47(3). 1018–1036. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bassiouni, Ahmed, et al.. (2022). Customised acoustic therapy delivered through a web‐based platform—An innovative approach to tinnitus treatment. Clinical Otolaryngology. 48(2). 226–234. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bassiouni, Ahmed, et al.. (2022). FiveQ : A new easy‐to‐use validated clinical instrument for tinnitus severity. Clinical Otolaryngology. 47(6). 672–679. 4 indexed citations
6.
Pham, Nguyen Tuong, Melanie Nelson, Nynke S. van den Berg, et al.. (2022). Preclinical feasibility of robot‐assisted sentinel lymph node biopsy using multi‐modality magnetic and fluorescence guidance in the head and neck. Head & Neck. 44(12). 2696–2707. 4 indexed citations
7.
Stern, Cindy, et al.. (2022). Correlation between radiologic and pathologic extranodal extension in HPV‐associated oropharyngeal cancer: Systematic review. Head & Neck. 44(12). 2875–2885. 6 indexed citations
8.
Sethi, Neeraj, et al.. (2020). Transoral robotic narrow field oropharyngectomy for tumours of the parapharyngeal space. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 16(3). e2083–e2083. 3 indexed citations
9.
Zhang, Jingjuan, Yingquan Zhang, Zitong Yu, et al.. (2020). Diurnal Changes in Water Soluble Carbohydrate Components in Leaves and Sucrose Associated TaSUT1 Gene Expression during Grain Development in Wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 21(21). 8276–8276. 9 indexed citations
10.
Mayne, George C., Charmaine M. Woods, Andrew Foreman, et al.. (2020). Cross validated serum small extracellular vesicle microRNAs for the detection of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Translational Medicine. 18(1). 280–280. 14 indexed citations
11.
Sethi, Neeraj, et al.. (2019). Transoral robotic surgery using the Medrobotic Flex® system: the Adelaide experience. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 14(1). 109–113. 19 indexed citations
12.
Foreman, Andrew, et al.. (2018). The acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 13(2). 301–307. 17 indexed citations
13.
Fong, Stephanie, et al.. (2017). Transoral robotic excision of a lingual thyroglossal duct cyst. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 12(2). 357–360. 10 indexed citations
14.
Boase, Sam, Andrew Foreman, Edward John Cleland, et al.. (2013). The microbiome of chronic rhinosinusitis: culture, molecular diagnostics and biofilm detection. BMC Infectious Diseases. 13(1). 210–210. 190 indexed citations
15.
Jervis‐Bardy, Joshua, Samuel Boase, Alkis J. Psaltis, Andrew Foreman, & Peter‐John Wormald. (2012). A randomized trial of mupirocin sinonasal rinses versus saline in surgically recalcitrant staphylococcal chronic rhinosinusitis. The Laryngoscope. 122(10). 2148–2153. 70 indexed citations
16.
Foreman, Andrew & Peter‐John Wormald. (2011). Can bottle design prevent bacterial contamination of nasal irrigation devices?. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology. 1(4). 303–307. 13 indexed citations
17.
Foreman, Andrew, et al.. (2011). Do biofilms contribute to the initiation and recalcitrance of chronic rhinosinusitis?. The Laryngoscope. 121(5). 1085–1091. 77 indexed citations
18.
Foreman, Andrew, et al.. (2010). The clinical significance of nasal irrigation bottle contamination. The Laryngoscope. 120(10). 2110–2114. 37 indexed citations
19.
Foreman, Andrew & Peter‐John Wormald. (2010). Different biofilms, different disease? A clinical outcomes study. The Laryngoscope. 120(8). 1701–1706. 113 indexed citations
20.
Foreman, Andrew, Deepti Singhal, Alkis J. Psaltis, & Peter‐John Wormald. (2009). Targeted imaging modality selection for bacterial biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis. The Laryngoscope. 120(2). 427–431. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026