Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Use of Computed Tomography in Pediatrics and the Associated Radiation Exposure and Estimated Cancer Risk
20131.1k citationsDiana L. Miglioretti, Eric Johnson et al.JAMA Pediatricsprofile →
Use of Diagnostic Imaging Studies and Associated Radiation Exposure for Patients Enrolled in Large Integrated Health Care Systems, 1996-2010
2012667 citationsRebecca Smith‐Bindman, Diana L. Miglioretti et al.JAMAprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Williams
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Williams. The network helps show where Andrew E. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew E. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew E. Williams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew E. Williams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew E. Williams. Andrew E. Williams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Europe, Regional Office for, Andrew E. Williams, Claudia Cláudia, et al.. (2020). What strategies are countries using to expand health workforce surge capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic?. 26(2). 51–57.29 indexed citations
Ferrari, Linda, et al.. (2019). Overview of patients with primary faecal incontinence symptoms: conservative treatment and surgical intervention based on symptoms’ stratification. Neurourology and Urodynamics.1 indexed citations
8.
Mandawat, Anant, Andrew E. Williams, & Sanjeev Francis. (2017). Cardio-oncology. Heart Failure Clinics. 13(2). 403–408.12 indexed citations
Vollmer, William M., Jeffrey Tom, Reesa Laws, et al.. (2014). Improving adherence to cardiovascular disease medications with information technology.. PubMed. 20(11 Spec No. 17). SP502–10.47 indexed citations
Miglioretti, Diana L., Eric Johnson, Andrew E. Williams, et al.. (2013). The Use of Computed Tomography in Pediatrics and the Associated Radiation Exposure and Estimated Cancer Risk. JAMA Pediatrics. 167(8). 700–700.1059 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Smith‐Bindman, Rebecca, Diana L. Miglioretti, Eric E. Johnson, et al.. (2012). Use of Diagnostic Imaging Studies and Associated Radiation Exposure for Patients Enrolled in Large Integrated Health Care Systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 307(22). 2400–9.667 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.