Andrew E. Pelling
- Cell Biology top 0.5%
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions 45
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 7
- Biomaterials top 1%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 8
- Biomedical Engineering top 2%
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 28
- Structural Biology top 5%
- Biophysics top 2%
-
- Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications 27
- Mechanical and Optical Resonators 5
-
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 8
-
- Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior 5
- Co-authors
- Kristina HaaseRyan J. HickeyJames K. GimzewskiDaniel J. ModulevskyCharles M. CuerrierBuzz BaumPatricia KundaTao Liu
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Andrew E. Pelling
73 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Cell Biology 1.2k
- Biomaterials 702
- Biomedical Engineering 1.2k
- Structural Biology 35
- Biophysics 136
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Pelling
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Pelling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Pelling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Pelling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Pelling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Pelling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Pelling. The network helps show where Andrew E. Pelling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew E. Pelling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 18 | Precisely delivered nano-mechanical forces induce blebbing in undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells | 2011 | 2 |
| 19 | 2009 | 68 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 20 |
About Andrew E. Pelling
Andrew E. Pelling is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 76 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (45 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (28 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (27 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (8 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (8 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (7 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers) and Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (1.2k citations), Biomaterials (702 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (1.2k citations). Andrew E. Pelling has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kristina Haase, Ryan J. Hickey, James K. Gimzewski, Daniel J. Modulevsky, Charles M. Cuerrier, Buzz Baum, Patricia Kunda, Tao Liu, Edith B. Gralla and Zeinab Al‐Rekabi. Their work appears in journals such as Integrative Biology, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Cytoskeleton and Journal of Visualized Experiments.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.