Andrew Da Lio

759 total citations
18 papers, 525 citations indexed

About

Andrew Da Lio is a scholar working on Surgery, Clinical Psychology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Da Lio has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 525 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Da Lio's work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (13 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (11 papers) and Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (6 papers). Andrew Da Lio is often cited by papers focused on Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (13 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (11 papers) and Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (6 papers). Andrew Da Lio collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Italy. Andrew Da Lio's co-authors include Jason Roostaeian, Jaco H. Festekjian, Christopher A. Crisera, Joan E. Lipa, Andrew J. Vardanian, John L. Clayton, Lucio Pavone, J. P. Watson, William W. Shaw and Fernando A. Herrera and has published in prestigious journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery and Bioengineering & Translational Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Da Lio

17 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Da Lio United States 9 486 133 98 29 22 18 525
Brian S. Glatt United States 7 359 0.7× 86 0.6× 91 0.9× 40 1.4× 30 1.4× 7 400
Roy De Vita Italy 15 409 0.8× 176 1.3× 75 0.8× 35 1.2× 25 1.1× 35 494
Bahair H. Ghazi United States 10 425 0.9× 91 0.7× 65 0.7× 32 1.1× 16 0.7× 11 470
Armando A. Davila United States 10 573 1.2× 136 1.0× 99 1.0× 19 0.7× 26 1.2× 20 601
Kai M. M. Saariniemi Finland 10 282 0.6× 78 0.6× 99 1.0× 43 1.5× 24 1.1× 13 338
Alberto Rancati Argentina 13 422 0.9× 154 1.2× 36 0.4× 30 1.0× 21 1.0× 54 474
Barbara Cagli Italy 12 343 0.7× 73 0.5× 39 0.4× 29 1.0× 28 1.3× 45 414
Marwan H. Abboud Belgium 9 324 0.7× 70 0.5× 56 0.6× 26 0.9× 19 0.9× 20 340
Eliana F. R. Duraes United States 13 286 0.6× 45 0.3× 50 0.5× 40 1.4× 41 1.9× 38 362
Andrea Loreti Italy 10 285 0.6× 110 0.8× 27 0.3× 25 0.9× 19 0.9× 28 348

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Da Lio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Da Lio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Da Lio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Da Lio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Da Lio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Da Lio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Da Lio. The network helps show where Andrew Da Lio may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Da Lio

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Da Lio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Da Lio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Da Lio. Andrew Da Lio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Patel, Harsh, et al.. (2024). A Single-center Comparison of Surgical Outcomes following Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 12(6). e5880–e5880. 2 indexed citations
2.
Frydrych, Lynn M., Andrew Da Lio, Jason Roostaeian, et al.. (2023). Sarcopenia Best Predicts Complications in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 11(7). e5125–e5125. 2 indexed citations
3.
Miller, Amanda P., Michael Wells, Andrew Da Lio, et al.. (2023). Same-Day Discharge for Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 153(4). 683e–689e. 4 indexed citations
4.
Xu, Xue, Yulong Zhang, Pin Ha, et al.. (2022). A novel injectable fibromodulin‐releasing granular hydrogel for tendon healing and functional recovery. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine. 8(1). e10355–e10355. 16 indexed citations
5.
Dorfman, Robert, et al.. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic and Plastic Surgery: Literature Review, Ethical Analysis, and Proposed Guidelines. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 146(4). 482e–493e. 17 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Maxwell, Emily Berthiaume, Andrew Da Lio, et al.. (2019). Evaluating Current Scar Assessment Methods. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 84(2). 222–231. 25 indexed citations
7.
Roostaeian, Jason, Alfred P. Yoon, Chris Gold, et al.. (2016). Impact of Prior Tissue Expander/Implant on Postmastectomy Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 137(4). 1083–1091. 14 indexed citations
8.
Vardanian, Andrew J., Steve P. Lee, Andrew Da Lio, et al.. (2013). Comparison of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix in the Setting of Post-Mastectomy Radiation. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 132. 136–136.
9.
Roostaeian, Jason, Andrew J. Vardanian, Fernando A. Herrera, et al.. (2012). Comparison of Immediate Implant Placement versus the Staged Tissue Expander Technique in Breast Reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 129(6). 909e–918e. 56 indexed citations
10.
Roostaeian, Jason, et al.. (2012). Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Previously Augmented Patients. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 130. 40–40. 1 indexed citations
11.
Vardanian, Andrew J., John L. Clayton, Jason Roostaeian, et al.. (2011). Comparison of Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 128(5). 403e–410e. 255 indexed citations
12.
Roostaeian, Jason, Lucio Pavone, Andrew Da Lio, et al.. (2011). Immediate Placement of Implants in Breast Reconstruction: Patient Selection and Outcomes. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 127(4). 1407–1416. 60 indexed citations
13.
Kropf, Nina, Sheina A. Macadam, Colleen M. McCarthy, et al.. (2010). Influence of the recipient vessel on fat necrosis after breast reconstruction with a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 44(2). 96–101. 7 indexed citations
14.
Vardanian, Andrew J., John L. Clayton, Jason Roostaeian, et al.. (2010). Comparison of Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 126. 22–22. 1 indexed citations
15.
Antony, Anuja K., et al.. (2009). Technique of Internal Mammary Dissection Using Pectoralis Major Flap to Prevent Contour Deformities. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 123(6). 1674–1675. 7 indexed citations
16.
Boyd, J. Brian, et al.. (2009). Comparison of Superior Gluteal Artery Musculocutaneous and Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 123(6). 1641–1647. 7 indexed citations
17.
Mosahebi, Afshin, Andrew Da Lio, & Babak J. Mehrara. (2008). The Use of a Pectoralis Major Flap to Improve Internal Mammary Vessels Exposure and Reduce Contour Deformity in Microvascular Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 61(1). 30–34. 9 indexed citations
18.
Karanas, Yvonne L., et al.. (2003). Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer in Previously Augmented Patients. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 111(3). 1078–1083. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026