Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
2009607 citationsMarkus K. Brunnermeier, Andrew Crockett et al.London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Crockett
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Crockett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Crockett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Crockett more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Crockett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Crockett. The network helps show where Andrew Crockett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Crockett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Crockett.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Crockett based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Crockett. Andrew Crockett is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Crockett, Andrew, et al.. (2016). Measuring the impact, quality and effectiveness of legal assistance services in a climate of reduced funding and increased government expectations: the Australian experience. 22(3).2 indexed citations
2.
Crockett, Andrew, et al.. (2013). Measuring legal services: a practical methodology for measuring the quality and outcomes of legal assistance services. 32(1). 70.2 indexed citations
3.
Scott, Kenneth E., John B. Taylor, & Andrew Crockett. (2012). Bankruptcy not bailout : a special chapter 14.8 indexed citations
4.
Cecchetti, Stephen G., et al.. (2011). The future of central banking under post-crisis mandates. SSRN Electronic Journal.16 indexed citations
5.
Crockett, Andrew. (2009). Should the Federal Reserve be a Systemic Stability Regulator. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
6.
Brunnermeier, Markus K., Andrew Crockett, Charles Goodhart, Avinash Persaud, & Hyun Song Shin. (2009). The fundamental principles of financial regulation. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).607 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Crockett, Andrew. (2007). The evolution and regulation of hedge funds. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 19–28.7 indexed citations
8.
Crockett, Andrew. (2000). How should financial market regulators respond to the new challenges of global economic integration? : commentary. Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole. 121–128.4 indexed citations
9.
Crockett, Andrew. (1999). General discussion: exchange rates and financial fragility. Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole. 411–422.5 indexed citations
Crockett, Andrew & Morris Goldstein. (1976). Inflation under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates. 23(3). 509–544.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.