Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Clement
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Clement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Clement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Clement more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Clement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Clement. The network helps show where Andrew Clement may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Clement
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Clement.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Clement based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Clement. Andrew Clement is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Clement, Andrew. (2017). Addressing Mass State Surveillance Through Transparency and Network Sovereignty, within a Framework of International Human Rights Law - a Canadian Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Clement, Andrew, et al.. (2010). Regulatory Lessons for Internet Traffic Management from Japan, the European Union, and the United States: Toward Equity, Neutrality and Transparency. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.5 indexed citations
Clement, Andrew. (2004). PDC 2004 : artful integration : interweaving media, materials, and practices : proceedings of the eighth Participatory Design Conference 2004, July 27-31, 2004, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computing Machinery eBooks.9 indexed citations
12.
Graham, Mary, et al.. (1998). Building a Room of Our Own: The Cooperative Design of Web-based Group Project Support for an Educational Comminity. Participatory Design Conference. 219–228.1 indexed citations
13.
Clement, Andrew, et al.. (1996). CAVEAT Exemplar: Participatory Design in a Non-Profit Volunteer Organisation. Participatory Design Conference. 45–54.
14.
Clement, Andrew & Ina Wagner. (1996). Ethics and systems design. The politics of social responsibility. 231–236.2 indexed citations
15.
Clement, Andrew, et al.. (1994). PD Politics and Prospects. Participatory Design Conference. 3. 175.1 indexed citations
16.
Clement, Andrew, et al.. (1994). NetWORKing : connecting workers in and between organizations : proceedings of the IFIP WG9.1 Working Conference on NetWORKing, Vienna, Austria, 16-18 June 1993. North-Holland eBooks.1 indexed citations
17.
Clement, Andrew & Peter van den Besselaar. (1993). Participative design projects, a retrospective view.. Communications of the ACM. 36(6). 29–37.5 indexed citations
18.
Clement, Andrew, Marc Griffiths, & Peter van den Besselaar. (1992). Participatory Design Projects: A Retrospective Look. Participatory Design Conference. 81–89.9 indexed citations
19.
Besselaar, Peter van den, Andrew Clement, & Pertti Järvinen. (1991). Information System, Work and Organizational Design: Proceedings of the IFIP Tc9 Working Conference, Berlin, FRG, 10-13 July 1989. Elsevier eBooks.2 indexed citations
20.
Clement, Andrew & C. C. Gotlieb. (1988). Evolution of an organizational interface: the new business department at a large insurance firm (Reprint). 609–621.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.