Andrew Church

8.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
86 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Andrew Church is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Church has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 18 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 13 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Andrew Church's work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (15 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (11 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (11 papers). Andrew Church is often cited by papers focused on Land Use and Ecosystem Services (15 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (11 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (11 papers). Andrew Church collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Andrew Church's co-authors include Robert Fish, Martin Frost, Michael Winter, Kevin Sullivan, Mark Bhatti, Tim Coles, Peter H. Reid, Neil Ravenscroft, Jasper O. Kenter and Rosalind Bryce and has published in prestigious journals such as Optics Letters, Ecological Economics and Sustainability.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Church

83 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

Conceptualising cultural ecosyst... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2016 2000 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew Church United Kingdom 26 1.1k 846 775 529 402 86 3.1k
James J. Connolly United States 38 1.9k 1.7× 1.5k 1.8× 2.3k 3.0× 470 0.9× 290 0.7× 99 5.1k
Timothy Beatley United States 28 1.2k 1.1× 812 1.0× 788 1.0× 267 0.5× 259 0.6× 74 2.9k
B.H.M. Elands Netherlands 26 1.7k 1.6× 651 0.8× 1.6k 2.1× 180 0.3× 207 0.5× 73 3.0k
Arjen Buijs Netherlands 34 2.1k 1.9× 900 1.1× 2.1k 2.7× 191 0.4× 340 0.8× 77 4.1k
Laura A. Ogden United States 24 1.5k 1.3× 484 0.6× 1.1k 1.5× 112 0.2× 212 0.5× 40 3.3k
Delene Weber Australia 19 835 0.7× 980 1.2× 809 1.0× 325 0.6× 196 0.5× 36 2.2k
Stephen R.J. Sheppard Canada 31 2.1k 1.9× 1.1k 1.3× 1.2k 1.6× 169 0.3× 318 0.8× 86 4.2k
Graham Smith United Kingdom 31 778 0.7× 1.4k 1.6× 1.1k 1.5× 323 0.6× 270 0.7× 119 4.8k
Robert L. Ryan United States 26 1.4k 1.2× 913 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 156 0.3× 318 0.8× 62 2.8k
Debra Roberts South Africa 27 1.8k 1.6× 1.3k 1.6× 651 0.8× 227 0.4× 533 1.3× 66 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Church

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Church's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Church with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Church more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Church

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Church. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Church. The network helps show where Andrew Church may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Church

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Church. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Church based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Church. Andrew Church is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Church, Andrew, et al.. (2025). Demonstrating the Values-Based WeValue InSitu Approach to Capture Hidden Intangible Benefits of Ecosystem Services in Nigeria. Sustainability. 17(6). 2761–2761. 1 indexed citations
2.
Church, Andrew, František Batysta, Thomas Galvin, et al.. (2024). Demonstration of a 1 TW peak power, joule-level ultrashort Tm:YLF laser. Optics Letters. 49(6). 1583–1583. 6 indexed citations
3.
Reagan, Brendan A., Thomas Galvin, František Batysta, et al.. (2023). 100J-Level Energy Extraction in a Compact, Diode-Pumped Tm:YLF Amplifier. 83. SF1N.3–SF1N.3. 1 indexed citations
4.
Macpherson, Hannah, et al.. (2022). Mobile drawing methods in landscape research: collaborative drawing in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Landscape Research. 47(8). 1009–1023. 2 indexed citations
5.
Reagan, Brendan A., et al.. (2022). Multi-joule energy extraction in diode-pumped Tm:YLF. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 11034. 14–14. 1 indexed citations
6.
Schröter, Matthias, Mike Christie, Andrew Church, et al.. (2020). Indicators for relational values of nature’s contributions to good quality of life: the IPBES approach for Europe and Central Asia. Ecosystems and People. 16(1). 50–69. 59 indexed citations
7.
Christie, Mike, et al.. (2019). Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature’s contributions to people”: insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Sustainability Science. 14(5). 1267–1282. 55 indexed citations
8.
Martín-Ortega, Julia, Julia Martín-Ortega, Shahbaz Khan, et al.. (2015). Water Ecosystem Services. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 68 indexed citations
9.
Church, Andrew, Richard Mitchell, Neil Ravenscroft, & Lee Stapleton. (2015). ‘Growing your own’: A multi-level modelling approach to understanding personal food growing trends and motivations in Europe. Ecological Economics. 110. 71–80. 45 indexed citations
10.
Stapleton, Lee, et al.. (2014). A flexible ecosystem services proto-typology based on public opinion. Ecological Economics. 106. 83–90. 4 indexed citations
11.
Maxwell, Neil, et al.. (2014). Oxygen Cost of Recreational Horse-Riding in Females. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 12(6). 808–813. 14 indexed citations
12.
Adeyeye, Kemi, et al.. (2014). Beyond the water efficiency calculators. University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton). 19–28. 1 indexed citations
13.
Ravenscroft, Neil, et al.. (2013). Property Ownership, Resource Use, and the ‘Gift of Nature’. Environment and Planning D Society and Space. 31(3). 451–466. 6 indexed citations
14.
Bhatti, Mark, et al.. (2008). ‘I love being in the garden’: enchanting encounters in everyday life. Social & Cultural Geography. 10(1). 61–76. 56 indexed citations
15.
Church, Andrew & Tim Coles. (2006). Tourism, Power and Space. University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire). 179 indexed citations
16.
Church, Andrew, Martin Frost, & Kevin Sullivan. (2000). Transport and social exclusion in London. Transport Policy. 7(3). 195–205. 520 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Church, Andrew & Peter H. Reid. (1999). Cross-border Co-operation, Institutionalization and Political Space Across the English Channel. Regional Studies. 33(7). 643–655. 84 indexed citations
18.
Church, Andrew & Peter H. Reid. (1996). Urban Power, International Networks and Competition: The Example of Cross-border Cooperation. Urban Studies. 33(8). 1297–1318. 66 indexed citations
19.
Mawson, J., Andrew Church, Peter H. Reid, et al.. (1995). Policy Review Section. Regional Studies. 29(3). 297–316. 15 indexed citations
20.
Church, Andrew & Martin Frost. (1995). The Thames Gateway: An Analysis of the Emergence of a Sub-Regional Regeneration Initiative. Geographical Journal. 161(2). 199–199. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026