Andrew C. Diener
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Co-authors
- Frederick M. AusubelGerald R. FinkRoberto A. GaxiolaYunping ShenRoberto MorenoStephen B. CalderwoodEleftherios MylonakisJoseph Heitman
- Topics
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (9 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers)Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of Immunology
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew C. Diener
23 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Plant Science 956
- Molecular Biology 484
- Cell Biology 205
- Epidemiology 171
- Infectious Diseases 170
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew C. Diener
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew C. Diener's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew C. Diener with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew C. Diener more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew C. Diener
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew C. Diener. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew C. Diener. The network helps show where Andrew C. Diener may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew C. Diener
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew C. Diener. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew C. Diener based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew C. Diener. Andrew C. Diener is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 96 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 70 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | Fusarium wilt of Arabidopsis thaliana. | 1 |
| 11 | 357 | |
| 12 | 160 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | T-cell-receptor isoforms. | 4 |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Andrew C. Diener
Andrew C. Diener is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (9 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (956 citations), Cell Biology (205 citations) and Insect Science (139 citations). Andrew C. Diener has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frederick M. Ausubel, Gerald R. Fink, Roberto A. Gaxiola, Yunping Shen, Roberto Moreno, Stephen B. Calderwood, Eleftherios Mylonakis, Joseph Heitman, Alexander Idnurm and Joseph El Khoury. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.