Andreas Möck

3.8k citations
79 papers · 2.9k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Andreas Möck

77 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Andreas Möck
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 505
  • Biomaterials 572
  • Genetics 328
  • Cancer Research 393
  • Organic Chemistry 769
Replace Yi‐Chang Liu with:
Yi‐Chang Liu Taiwan
Markus Schöber United States
Hang Su China
Xingyue He China
Natalie E. Simpson United States
Ana Sofia Ribeiro Portugal
Zhiyuan Shen United States
Xiao Chan Gao China
Sabina I. Swierczek United States
Biyun Wang China
Andreas Möck relative to Yi‐Chang Liu Taiwan Yi‐Chang Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Yi‐Chang Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andreas Möck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andreas Möck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andreas Möck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andreas Möck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andreas Möck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andreas Möck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andreas Möck. The network helps show where Andreas Möck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andreas Möck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andreas Möck Line = papers co-authored together Andreas Möck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002401
2 2003266
3 1990220
4 2021192
5 2002135
6 2002125
7 2020120
8 2020107
9 201797
10 202388
11 201567
12 201762
13 200159
14 202247
15 199145
16 201845
17 202242
18 201441
19 201639
20 201634

About Andreas Möck

Andreas Möck is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Genetics, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Immunology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (12 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (4 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (4 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (3 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers) and Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (505 citations), Biomaterials (572 citations), Genetics (328 citations), Cancer Research (393 citations) and Organic Chemistry (769 citations). Andreas Möck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Eric F. Connor, James L. Hedrick, Gregory W. Nyce, Matthew B. Myers, G. Peters, Thierry Glauser, Robert M. Waymouth, Christel C. Herold‐Mende, David N. Louis and John C. DeWitt. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, Cancers, Nature Communications, Frontiers in Oncology and npj Precision Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact