Ana-Maria Philip

12 total papers · 872 total citations
11 papers, 643 citations indexed

About

Ana-Maria Philip is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Ana-Maria Philip has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 643 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Ophthalmology, 10 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 2 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Ana-Maria Philip's work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (9 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers). Ana-Maria Philip is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (9 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers). Ana-Maria Philip collaborates with scholars based in Austria and United States. Ana-Maria Philip's co-authors include Bianca S. Gerendas, Ursula Schmidt‐Erfurth, Sebastian M. Waldstein, Georg Langs, Dominika Podkowinski, Hrvoje Bogunović, Amir Sadeghipour, Thomas Schlegl, Christian Simader and Jing Wu and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Ana-Maria Philip

11 papers receiving 631 citations

Hit Papers

Fully Automated Detection... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 100 200 300 400

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Ana-Maria Philip 597 534 120 78 32 11 643
Dominika Podkowinski 647 1.1× 635 1.2× 137 1.1× 72 0.9× 34 1.1× 28 751
Yue Wu 443 0.7× 395 0.7× 90 0.8× 56 0.7× 32 1.0× 21 554
Hagar Khalid 512 0.9× 501 0.9× 47 0.4× 41 0.5× 46 1.4× 37 670
Andres Diaz‐Pinto 495 0.8× 326 0.6× 67 0.6× 303 3.9× 81 2.5× 14 623
Fedra Hajizadeh 570 1.0× 553 1.0× 208 1.7× 192 2.5× 32 1.0× 29 770
Junkichi Yamagami 482 0.8× 599 1.1× 44 0.4× 38 0.5× 15 0.5× 25 651
Noriaki Takase 507 0.8× 550 1.0× 81 0.7× 27 0.3× 8 0.3× 11 609
Eduardo B. Mariottoni 521 0.9× 536 1.0× 58 0.5× 45 0.6× 22 0.7× 28 597
Hideharu Ohsugi 561 0.9× 587 1.1× 42 0.3× 41 0.5× 21 0.7× 16 706
Ahmed M. Hagag 533 0.9× 592 1.1× 112 0.9× 22 0.3× 8 0.3× 37 717

Countries citing papers authored by Ana-Maria Philip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana-Maria Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana-Maria Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana-Maria Philip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana-Maria Philip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana-Maria Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana-Maria Philip. The network helps show where Ana-Maria Philip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana-Maria Philip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana-Maria Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana-Maria Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana-Maria Philip. Ana-Maria Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026