Ana-Maria Philip

882 total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Ana-Maria Philip is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Ana-Maria Philip has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Ophthalmology, 10 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 2 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Ana-Maria Philip's work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (9 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers). Ana-Maria Philip is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (9 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers). Ana-Maria Philip collaborates with scholars based in Austria and United States. Ana-Maria Philip's co-authors include Ursula Schmidt‐Erfurth, Bianca S. Gerendas, Sebastian M. Waldstein, Georg Langs, Dominika Podkowinski, Hrvoje Bogunović, Thomas Schlegl, Amir Sadeghipour, Christian Simader and Milan Sonka and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

Ana-Maria Philip

11 papers receiving 637 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Fully Automated Detection and Quantification of Macular Fluid in OCT Using Deep Learning

2017 422 citations Thomas Schlegl, Sebastian M. Waldstein et al. Ophthalmology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ana-Maria Philip Austria	8	604	539	122	78	32	11	649
Dominika Podkowinski Austria	12	652 1.1×	641 1.2×	139 1.1×	72 0.9×	34 1.1×	28	758
Eduardo B. Mariottoni United States	15	533 0.9×	544 1.0×	61 0.5×	45 0.6×	22 0.7×	28	612
Doug M. Baughman United States	2	402 0.7×	310 0.6×	86 0.7×	81 1.0×	37 1.2×	4	444
Pengxiao Zang United States	14	433 0.7×	353 0.7×	181 1.5×	64 0.8×	46 1.4×	22	532
Freerk G. Venhuizen Netherlands	7	425 0.7×	335 0.6×	159 1.3×	117 1.5×	23 0.7×	11	468
Guangzhou An Japan	7	324 0.5×	251 0.5×	50 0.4×	94 1.2×	37 1.2×	10	387
Naofumi Ishitobi Japan	10	394 0.7×	350 0.6×	41 0.3×	48 0.6×	30 0.9×	13	470
Hiroki Masumoto Japan	13	361 0.6×	340 0.6×	39 0.3×	41 0.5×	25 0.8×	18	470
Jianyang Xie China	11	379 0.6×	279 0.5×	96 0.8×	130 1.7×	44 1.4×	31	497
Jason Kugelman Australia	9	310 0.5×	214 0.4×	165 1.4×	72 0.9×	42 1.3×	20	393

Countries citing papers authored by Ana-Maria Philip

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana-Maria Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana-Maria Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana-Maria Philip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana-Maria Philip

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana-Maria Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana-Maria Philip. The network helps show where Ana-Maria Philip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ana-Maria Philip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ana-Maria Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ana-Maria Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ana-Maria Philip. Ana-Maria Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

Podkowinski, Dominika, Ana-Maria Philip, Wolf‐Dieter Vogl, et al.. (2018). Neuroretinal atrophy following resolution of macular oedema in retinal vein occlusion. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 103(1). 36–42. 15 indexed citations

Schlegl, Thomas, Sebastian M. Waldstein, Hrvoje Bogunović, et al.. (2017). Fully Automated Detection and Quantification of Macular Fluid in OCT Using Deep Learning. Ophthalmology. 125(4). 549–558. 422 indexed citations breakdown →

Klimscha, Sophie, Sebastian M. Waldstein, Thomas Schlegl, et al.. (2017). Spatial Correspondence Between Intraretinal Fluid, Subretinal Fluid, and Pigment Epithelial Detachment in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(10). 4039–4039. 31 indexed citations

Podkowinski, Dominika, Christian Simader, Hrvoje Bogunović, et al.. (2017). Impact of B-Scan Averaging on Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Image Quality before and after Cataract Surgery. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017. 1–8. 5 indexed citations

Waldstein, Sebastian M., Alessio Montuoro, Dominika Podkowinski, et al.. (2017). Evaluating the impact of vitreomacular adhesion on anti-VEGF therapy for retinal vein occlusion using machine learning. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 2928–2928. 16 indexed citations

Wu, Jing, Wolf‐Dieter Vogl, Ana-Maria Philip, et al.. (2016). A novel benchmark model for intelligent annotation of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans using the example of cyst annotation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 130. 93–105. 7 indexed citations

Philip, Ana-Maria, Dominika Podkowinski, Eleonore Pablik, et al.. (2016). Presence of subretinal fluid at baseline preserves from photoreceptor alterations in diabetic macular edema and cystoid macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion. 57(12). 4164–4164. 4 indexed citations

Montuoro, Alessio, Sebastian M. Waldstein, Bianca S. Gerendas, et al.. (2016). Data driven discovery of anti-VEGF treatment response groups based on fully automatic vitreomacular interface segmentation. 57(12). 5944–5944. 1 indexed citations

Philip, Ana-Maria, Bianca S. Gerendas, Henrik Faatz, et al.. (2016). Choroidal thickness maps from spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography: algorithmic versus ground truth annotation. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 100(10). 1372–1376. 32 indexed citations

10.

Wu, Jing, Ana-Maria Philip, Dominika Podkowinski, et al.. (2016). Multivendor Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Dataset, Observer Annotation Performance Evaluation, and Standardized Evaluation Framework for Intraretinal Cystoid Fluid Segmentation. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016. 1–8. 32 indexed citations

11.

Waldstein, Sebastian M., Ana-Maria Philip, Christian Simader, et al.. (2015). Correlation of 3-Dimensionally Quantified Intraretinal and Subretinal Fluid With Visual Acuity in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmology. 134(2). 182–182. 84 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact