Amy Thomas

1.1k total citations
29 papers, 602 citations indexed

About

Amy Thomas is a scholar working on Soil Science, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Thomas has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 602 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Soil Science, 10 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 7 papers in Environmental Engineering. Recurrent topics in Amy Thomas's work include Soil erosion and sediment transport (7 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (6 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5 papers). Amy Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Soil erosion and sediment transport (7 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (6 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5 papers). Amy Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Amy Thomas's co-authors include Bridget A. Emmett, B. J. Cosby, Laurence Jones, Kevin M. Hiscock, Alan Bond, Dario Masante, Bethanna Jackson, Linda May, David A. Robinson and John W. Redhead and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Scientific Reports and Global Change Biology.

In The Last Decade

Amy Thomas

27 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy Thomas United Kingdom 16 269 143 122 109 71 29 602
Jinmin Hao China 14 312 1.2× 158 1.1× 115 0.9× 51 0.5× 94 1.3× 48 591
Samaneh Seifollahi‐Aghmiuni Sweden 11 264 1.0× 235 1.6× 154 1.3× 120 1.1× 97 1.4× 12 728
Cuiwei Zhao China 14 361 1.3× 108 0.8× 189 1.5× 154 1.4× 93 1.3× 29 790
Lucia Perugini Italy 13 506 1.9× 158 1.1× 179 1.5× 142 1.3× 46 0.6× 28 769
Ligia B. Azevedo Netherlands 12 127 0.5× 153 1.1× 166 1.4× 199 1.8× 40 0.6× 12 744
G. A. Alexandrov Russia 16 480 1.8× 141 1.0× 230 1.9× 182 1.7× 44 0.6× 52 941
Timothy S. Farewell United Kingdom 10 126 0.5× 109 0.8× 174 1.4× 77 0.7× 58 0.8× 19 624
Jintong Liu China 15 157 0.6× 108 0.8× 75 0.6× 80 0.7× 43 0.6× 42 465
Jing Hu China 19 187 0.7× 208 1.5× 327 2.7× 114 1.0× 38 0.5× 64 986
Fabrizio Albanito United Kingdom 14 230 0.9× 178 1.2× 162 1.3× 100 0.9× 30 0.4× 24 659

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Thomas. The network helps show where Amy Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Thomas. Amy Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Thomas, Amy, B. Williams, Sabine Reinsch, et al.. (2025). First Signs That National Cropland Organic Carbon Loss Is Reversing in British Topsoils. European Journal of Soil Science. 76(3). 2 indexed citations
3.
Robinson, David A., Shmulik P. Friedman, Amy Thomas, et al.. (2025). Soil bulk density and porosity connecting macro- and micro-scales through geometry.. Earth-Science Reviews. 268. 105173–105173.
4.
Thomas, Amy, Fiona M. Seaton, Els Dhiedt, et al.. (2024). Topsoil porosity prediction across habitats at large scales using environmental variables. The Science of The Total Environment. 922. 171158–171158. 3 indexed citations
5.
Feeney, Christopher J., Daniele De Rosa, Panos Panagos, et al.. (2024). Benchmarking soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration provides more robust soil health assessment than the SOC/clay ratio at European scale. The Science of The Total Environment. 951. 175642–175642. 17 indexed citations
6.
Thomas, Amy, Christopher J. Feeney, Stephen Lofts, et al.. (2023). Land degradation neutrality: Testing the indicator in a temperate agricultural landscape. Journal of Environmental Management. 346. 118884–118884. 9 indexed citations
7.
Matten, Sharlene R., Dawn M. Fallacara, Alaa Kamel, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of multigenerational effects of 2‐ethylhexyl 4‐hydroxybenzoate in Japanese medaka. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 43(11). 1645–1666. 4 indexed citations
8.
Feeney, Christopher J., et al.. (2023). Agricultural practices drive elevated rates of topsoil decline across Kenya, but terracing and reduced tillage can reverse this. The Science of The Total Environment. 870. 161925–161925. 15 indexed citations
9.
Robinson, David A., Amy Thomas, Sabine Reinsch, et al.. (2022). Analytical modelling of soil porosity and bulk density across the soil organic matter and land-use continuum. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 7085–7085. 48 indexed citations
10.
Feeney, Christopher J., B. J. Cosby, David A. Robinson, et al.. (2022). Multiple soil map comparison highlights challenges for predicting topsoil organic carbon concentration at national scale. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 1379–1379. 19 indexed citations
11.
Fletcher, David, et al.. (2022). Location, Location, Location: Modelling of Noise Mitigation by Urban Woodland Shows the Benefit of Targeted Tree Planting in Cities. Sustainability. 14(12). 7079–7079. 19 indexed citations
12.
Wuepper, David, Pasquale Borrelli, Panos Panagos, et al.. (2021). A ‘debt’ based approach to land degradation as an indicator of global change. Global Change Biology. 27(21). 5407–5410. 19 indexed citations
13.
Thomas, Amy, B. J. Cosby, Peter A. Henrys, & Bridget A. Emmett. (2020). Patterns and trends of topsoil carbon in the UK: Complex interactions of land use change, climate and pollution. The Science of The Total Environment. 729. 138330–138330. 19 indexed citations
14.
Blyth, Eleanor, Bridget A. Emmett, Chris Evans, et al.. (2019). Zones of influence for soil organic matter dynamics: A conceptual framework for data and models. Global Change Biology. 25(12). 3996–4007. 21 indexed citations
15.
Norton, Lisa, Simon M. Smart, Lindsay C. Maskell, et al.. (2018). Identifying effective approaches for monitoring national natural capital for policy use. Ecosystem Services. 30. 98–106. 14 indexed citations
16.
Sharps, Katrina, Dario Masante, Amy Thomas, et al.. (2017). Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. The Science of The Total Environment. 584-585. 118–130. 159 indexed citations
17.
Bussi, Gianbattista, P. G. Whitehead, Amy Thomas, et al.. (2017). Climate and land-use change impact on faecal indicator bacteria in a temperate maritime catchment (the River Conwy, Wales). Journal of Hydrology. 553. 248–261. 18 indexed citations
18.
Maxwell, Deborah, David A. Robinson, Amy Thomas, et al.. (2017). Potential contribution of soil diversity and abundance metrics to identifying high nature value farmland (HNV). Geoderma. 305. 417–432. 6 indexed citations
19.
Gopalakrishna, Deepak, et al.. (2013). Planning for Systems Management & Operations as part of Climate Change Adaptation. 2 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026