Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Proposed Definitions and Criteria for Reporting Time Frame, Outcome, and Complications For Clinical Orthopedic Studies in Veterinary Medicine
2010300 citationsAmy S. Kapatkin et al.Veterinary Surgeryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Amy S. Kapatkin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy S. Kapatkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy S. Kapatkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy S. Kapatkin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy S. Kapatkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy S. Kapatkin. The network helps show where Amy S. Kapatkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy S. Kapatkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy S. Kapatkin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy S. Kapatkin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amy S. Kapatkin. Amy S. Kapatkin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bergh, Mary Sarah, Robert S. Gilley, Frances S. Shofer, & Amy S. Kapatkin. (2006). Complications and radiographic findings following cemented total hip replacement: a retrospective evaluation of 97 dogs.. PubMed. 19(3). 172–9.67 indexed citations
8.
Gilley, Robert S., et al.. (2005). Diagnostic and surgical applications of arthroscopy in dogs: Hindlimb joint diseases. Compendium on Continuing Education for The Practicing Veterinarian. 27(8). 596–610.2 indexed citations
9.
Kapatkin, Amy S., et al.. (2005). Diagnostic and surgical applications of arthroscopy in dogs: General applications and forelimb joint diseases. Compendium on Continuing Education for The Practicing Veterinarian. 27(8). 580–594.1 indexed citations
Kapatkin, Amy S., Philipp D. Mayhew, & Gail K. Smith. (2002). Genetic control of canine hip dysplasia. Compendium on Continuing Education for The Practicing Veterinarian. 24(9). 681–687.10 indexed citations
13.
Kapatkin, Amy S., et al.. (2002). Canine hip dysplasia: The disease and its diagnosis. Compendium on Continuing Education for The Practicing Veterinarian. 24(7). 526–538.19 indexed citations
14.
Kapatkin, Amy S., Philipp D. Mayhew, & Gail K. Smith. (2002). Canine hip dysplasia: Evidence-based treatment. Compendium on Continuing Education for The Practicing Veterinarian. 24(8). 590–599.5 indexed citations
Kapatkin, Amy S. & David T. Matthiesen. (1991). Feline high-rise syndrome. Compendium on Continuing Education for The Practicing Veterinarian.11 indexed citations
19.
Kapatkin, Amy S., et al.. (1990). Nasopharyngeal and ear canal polyps in the cat.. 18(4). 16–19.4 indexed citations
20.
Kapatkin, Amy S., et al.. (1990). Results of surgery and long-term follow-up in 31 cats with nasopharyngeal polyps. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association. 26(4). 387–392.33 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.