Amy M Dennett

1.1k total citations
45 papers, 614 citations indexed

About

Amy M Dennett is a scholar working on Oncology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy M Dennett has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 614 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Oncology, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 11 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Amy M Dennett's work include Cancer survivorship and care (26 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (14 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (11 papers). Amy M Dennett is often cited by papers focused on Cancer survivorship and care (26 papers), Lymphatic System and Diseases (14 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (11 papers). Amy M Dennett collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Amy M Dennett's co-authors include Nicholas F. Taylor, Casey L. Peiris, Nora Shields, Luke A. Prendergast, Katherine E. Harding, David A. Snowdon, Phillip Parente, Cylie Williams, Paul O’Halloran and Mitchell Sarkies and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Amy M Dennett

41 papers receiving 603 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy M Dennett Australia 13 359 158 122 86 79 45 614
Kellie Toohey Australia 15 511 1.4× 192 1.2× 166 1.4× 80 0.9× 67 0.8× 47 822
Gráinne Sheill Ireland 11 265 0.7× 116 0.7× 54 0.4× 36 0.4× 97 1.2× 28 583
Lisbeth Rosenbek Minet Denmark 14 135 0.4× 52 0.3× 72 0.6× 121 1.4× 46 0.6× 37 678
David M. Langelier Canada 12 302 0.8× 147 0.9× 87 0.7× 40 0.5× 41 0.5× 33 438
Oren Cheifetz Canada 10 328 0.9× 166 1.1× 46 0.4× 34 0.4× 104 1.3× 13 481
Ki Y. Shin United States 14 152 0.4× 112 0.7× 108 0.9× 75 0.9× 141 1.8× 24 576
Caroline S. Kampshoff Netherlands 15 540 1.5× 314 2.0× 40 0.3× 75 0.9× 34 0.4× 21 743
Sydnee Stoyles United States 11 306 0.9× 51 0.3× 80 0.7× 62 0.7× 21 0.3× 29 588
Anouska Carter United Kingdom 12 153 0.4× 48 0.3× 51 0.4× 77 0.9× 24 0.3× 18 498
Sharon K. Coon United States 14 489 1.4× 265 1.7× 61 0.5× 114 1.3× 58 0.7× 25 756

Countries citing papers authored by Amy M Dennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy M Dennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy M Dennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy M Dennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy M Dennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy M Dennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy M Dennett. The network helps show where Amy M Dennett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy M Dennett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy M Dennett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy M Dennett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy M Dennett. Amy M Dennett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harding, Katherine E., et al.. (2025). Getting the timing right: An implementation study and pre post audit to implement evidence-based parathyroid scan guidelines. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences. 56(4). 101894–101894.
2.
Dennett, Amy M, Katherine E. Harding, Casey L. Peiris, et al.. (2025). Feasibility of increasing physical activity levels of hospitalized cancer survivors using goal setting and feedback (CanFit): a randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 128. 101776–101776.
3.
Ashton, Lee, Richard Cullen, Amy M Dennett, et al.. (2024). Adapting a Telehealth Physical Activity and Diet Intervention to a Co-Designed Website for Self-Management After Stroke: Tutorial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 26. e58419–e58419. 4 indexed citations
4.
Dennett, Amy M, Nora Shields, Christian J. Barton, et al.. (2024). ‘Making a connection’: a qualitative study of experiences from a cancer telerehabilitation program. Supportive Care in Cancer. 32(10). 636–636.
6.
Lee, Christine, et al.. (2024). Caffeine consumed prior to cardiac stress testing may affect diagnostic accuracy of nuclear medicine myocardial imaging of myocardial ischemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences. 55(1). 134–145. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lakhani, Ali, et al.. (2024). Palliative rehabilitation and quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. spcare–2024. 2 indexed citations
8.
Harding, Katherine E., et al.. (2023). An evidence‐based demand management strategy using a hub and spoke training model reduces waiting time for children's therapy services: An implementation trial. Child Care Health and Development. 50(1). e13154–e13154. 4 indexed citations
9.
Dennett, Amy M, Kelly A. Hirko, Kathleen Porter, et al.. (2023). Embedding lifestyle interventions into cancer care: has telehealth narrowed the equity gap?. JNCI Monographs. 2023(61). 133–139. 8 indexed citations
11.
Dennett, Amy M, Judi Porter, Stephen B. Ting, & Nicholas F. Taylor. (2023). Prehabilitation to improve outcomes afteR Autologous sTem cEll transplantation (PIRATE): A pilot randomised controlled trial protocol. PLoS ONE. 18(4). e0277760–e0277760. 2 indexed citations
12.
Dennett, Amy M, Clarice Tang, Christian Osadnik, et al.. (2022). A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Cancer. 8(2). e34903–e34903. 11 indexed citations
13.
Peiris, Casey L., et al.. (2022). Cancer survivors maintain health benefits 6 to 12 months after exercise-based rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 18(3). 651–672. 7 indexed citations
14.
Snowdon, David A., Olivia King, Amy M Dennett, et al.. (2022). Delegation of patient related tasks to allied health assistants: a time motion study. BMC Health Services Research. 22(1). 1280–1280. 9 indexed citations
15.
Dennett, Amy M, et al.. (2021). Clinician’s perspectives of implementing exercise-based rehabilitation in a cancer unit: a qualitative study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 29(12). 8019–8026. 5 indexed citations
16.
Dennett, Amy M, et al.. (2020). PROGRAM FOR ONCOLOGY WELLNESS AND EXERCISE REHABILITATION (POWER): A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF ONCOLOGY REHABILITATION IN THE COMMUNITY. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
17.
Dennett, Amy M, Mitchell Sarkies, Nora Shields, et al.. (2020). Multidisciplinary, exercise-based oncology rehabilitation programs improve patient outcomes but their effects on healthcare service-level outcomes remain uncertain: a systematic review. Journal of physiotherapy. 67(1). 12–26. 24 indexed citations
19.
Dennett, Amy M, et al.. (2017). Does Psychoeducation Added to Oncology Rehabilitation Improve Physical Activity and Other Health Outcomes? A Systematic Review. Rehabilitation Oncology. 35(2). 61–71. 4 indexed citations
20.
Dennett, Amy M, et al.. (2011). Community ambulation after hip fracture: completing tasks to enable access to common community venues. Disability and Rehabilitation. 34(9). 707–714. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026