This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Lo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Lo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Lo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Lo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Lo. The network helps show where Amy Lo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Lo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Lo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Lo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Lo. Amy Lo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Glassman, Tiffany & Amy Lo. (2012). ExoExoZodi Mapper: a starshade probe mission. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8442. 84420H–84420H.4 indexed citations
Carpenter, Kenneth G., Keith C. Gendreau, Jesse Leitner, et al.. (2009). Technology Development for Future Sparse Aperture Telescopes and Interferometers in Space. 2010. 47.
7.
Soummer, Rémi, W. Cash, Robert A. Brown, et al.. (2009). A starshade for JWST: science goals and optimization. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7440. 74400A–74400A.11 indexed citations
8.
Glassman, Tiffany, et al.. (2009). Starshade scaling relations. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7440. 744013–744013.8 indexed citations
9.
Lo, Amy, et al.. (2008). New Worlds Observer: Minotaur to Ares V. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7010. 70101W–70101W.2 indexed citations
Arenberg, Jonathan W., et al.. (2008). Sensitivity analysis of the New Worlds starshade's shadow. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7010. 70101V–70101V.1 indexed citations
12.
Arenberg, Jonathan W., Tiffany Glassman, Amy Lo, & Scott Benson. (2008). New Worlds Observer system architecture. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7010. 70101S–70101S.2 indexed citations
13.
Cash, W., et al.. (2007). New Worlds Observer tolerance overview. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6687. 66871A–66871A.2 indexed citations
Cash, Webster C., et al.. (2007). White Light Demonstration of One Hundred Parts per Billion Irradiance Suppression in Air by New Starshade Occulters. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).1 indexed citations
16.
Cash, W., Craig J. Copi, Sara R. Heap, et al.. (2007). External Occulters for the Direct Study of Exoplanets.
Arenberg, Jonathan W., R. S. Polidan, Tiffany Glassman, Amy Lo, & Charles F. Lillie. (2007). New Worlds Observer: system architecture for terrestrial planet finding. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6693. 669302–669302.1 indexed citations
20.
Arenberg, Jonathan W., Christopher Lau, & Amy Lo. (2005). Image quality budget for the Generation-X Telescope. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5900. 59001C–59001C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.