Amy J. Park

1.2k total citations
43 papers, 838 citations indexed

About

Amy J. Park is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy J. Park has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 838 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Rheumatology, 22 papers in Surgery and 6 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Amy J. Park's work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (21 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (11 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (7 papers). Amy J. Park is often cited by papers focused on Pelvic floor disorders treatments (21 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (11 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (7 papers). Amy J. Park collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Amy J. Park's co-authors include Robert E. Gutman, Cheryl B. Iglesia, Andrew I. Sokol, Matthew D. Barber, Marie Fidela R. Paraiso, J. Eric Jelovsek, Beri Ridgeway, Tommaso Falcone, Jon I. Einarsson and Danielle D. Antosh and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and The Journals of Gerontology Series A.

In The Last Decade

Amy J. Park

40 papers receiving 819 citations

Peers

Amy J. Park
Cara L. Grimes United States
David Sheyn United States
Mary Ellen Wechter United States
Sara Cichowski United States
Erin T. Carey United States
Danielle D. Antosh United States
Kathie L. Hullfish United States
Andrew F. Hundley United States
Cara L. Grimes United States
Amy J. Park
Citations per year, relative to Amy J. Park Amy J. Park (= 1×) peers Cara L. Grimes

Countries citing papers authored by Amy J. Park

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy J. Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy J. Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy J. Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy J. Park

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy J. Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy J. Park. The network helps show where Amy J. Park may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy J. Park

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy J. Park. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy J. Park based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy J. Park. Amy J. Park is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nowacki, Amy S., et al.. (2024). Virtual Compared With In-Office Postoperative Visits After Urogynecologic Surgery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 144(4). 562–572. 3 indexed citations
2.
Tappy, Erryn, Joseph I. Schaffer, Alexis A. Dieter, et al.. (2024). Effects of Social Determinants of Health and Social Support on Surgical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 145(1). 115–123.
3.
Propst, Katie, et al.. (2023). Restrictive opioid prescribing after surgery for prolapse and incontinence: a randomized, noninferiority trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 230(3). 340.e1–340.e13.
4.
Berg, Carla J., Nina C. Schleicher, Trent O Johnson, et al.. (2020). Vape shop identification, density and place characteristics in six metropolitan areas across the US. Preventive Medicine Reports. 19. 101137–101137. 21 indexed citations
5.
Stone, Rebecca L., Erin T. Carey, Amanda N. Fader, et al.. (2020). Enhanced Recovery and Surgical Optimization Protocol for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: An AAGL White Paper. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 28(2). 179–203. 94 indexed citations
6.
Gutman, Robert E., Charles R. Rardin, Eric R. Sokol, et al.. (2017). Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Parallel Cohort Study. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 72(4). 225–226. 5 indexed citations
7.
Gutman, Robert E., et al.. (2017). Defining Cervical Elongation: A Prospective Observational Study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 39(4). 223–228. 8 indexed citations
8.
Giri, Ayush, Katherine E. Hartmann, Melinda C. Aldrich, et al.. (2017). Admixture mapping of pelvic organ prolapse in African Americans from the Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Therapy trial. PLoS ONE. 12(6). e0178839–e0178839. 4 indexed citations
9.
Gutman, Robert E., Charles R. Rardin, Eric R. Sokol, et al.. (2016). Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 216(1). 38.e1–38.e11. 70 indexed citations
10.
Giri, Ayush, Jennifer M. Wu, Renée M Ward, et al.. (2015). Genetic Determinants of Pelvic Organ Prolapse among African American and Hispanic Women in the Women’s Health Initiative. PLoS ONE. 10(11). e0141647–e0141647. 19 indexed citations
11.
Carter-Brooks, Charelle M., Andrew I. Sokol, Eshetu Tefera, et al.. (2015). Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Placement of Synthetic Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 22(3). 151–155. 30 indexed citations
12.
Paraiso, Marie Fidela R., Beri Ridgeway, Amy J. Park, et al.. (2013). A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 208(5). 368.e1–368.e7. 138 indexed citations
13.
Antosh, Danielle D., Tamika Auguste, Elizabeth George, et al.. (2013). Blinded Assessment of Operative Performance After Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology Training. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 20(3). 353–359. 20 indexed citations
14.
Antosh, Danielle D., et al.. (2012). Short-Term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 18(3). 158–161. 29 indexed citations
15.
Antosh, Danielle D., et al.. (2012). Incidence of corneal abrasions during pelvic reconstructive surgery. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 166(2). 226–228. 1 indexed citations
16.
Yurteri-Kaplan, Ladin A., Danielle D. Antosh, Andrew I. Sokol, et al.. (2012). Interest in cosmetic vulvar surgery and perception of vulvar appearance. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 207(5). 428.e1–428.e7. 34 indexed citations
17.
Antosh, Danielle D., Robert E. Gutman, Cheryl B. Iglesia, Andrew I. Sokol, & Amy J. Park. (2011). Resident Opinions on Vaginal Hysterectomy Training. Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery. 17(6). 314–317. 18 indexed citations
18.
Park, Amy J. & Marie Fidela R. Paraiso. (2009). Successful Use of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Refractory Postoperative Dyspareunia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 114(2). 484–487. 11 indexed citations
19.
Park, Amy J., et al.. (2008). Transient obturator neuropathy due to local anesthesia during transobturator sling placement. International Urogynecology Journal. 20(2). 247–249. 5 indexed citations
20.
Lowder, Jerry L., Amy J. Park, Chiara Ghetti, et al.. (2008). The Role of Apical Vaginal Support in the Appearance of Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Prolapse. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 111(1). 152–157. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026