Amy E. Thurber
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Microbiology top 10%
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Papers in
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 1
- Melanoma and MAPK Pathways 1
-
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 2
- Silk-based biomaterials and applications 2
- Co-authors
- David L. Kaplan (4 shared papers)Fiorenzo G. Omenetto (1 shared paper)Richard A. Sturm (3 shared papers)Darren J. Smit (3 shared papers)J. Helen Leonard (2 shared papers)Anthony L. Cook (2 shared papers)Aaron G. Smith (2 shared papers)Susan E. Zabierowski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Microbiology (1 paper)Biomaterials (1 paper)The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology (1 paper)Oncotarget (1 paper)Journal of Investigative Dermatology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaItaly
In The Last Decade
Amy E. Thurber
8 papers receiving 625 citations
Amy E. Thurber's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Biomaterials 347
- Microbiology 50
- Dermatology 60
- Cell Biology 109
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films 44
Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Thurber
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Thurber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Thurber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Thurber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Thurber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Thurber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Thurber. The network helps show where Amy E. Thurber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy E. Thurber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 368 |
| 2 | 2008 | 85 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 11 |
About Amy E. Thurber
Amy E. Thurber is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomaterials, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Dermatology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include melanin and skin pigmentation (2 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Tendon Structure and Treatment (1 paper), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper) and Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (347 citations), Microbiology (50 citations), Dermatology (60 citations), Cell Biology (109 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (44 citations). Amy E. Thurber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David L. Kaplan, Fiorenzo G. Omenetto, Richard A. Sturm, Darren J. Smit, J. Helen Leonard, Anthony L. Cook, Aaron G. Smith, Susan E. Zabierowski, David L. Duffy and Jessica Wilks. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Microbiology, Biomaterials, The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, Oncotarget and Journal of Investigative Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.