Amy C. Moors

3.3k total citations
53 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Amy C. Moors is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy C. Moors has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 29 papers in Clinical Psychology and 26 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amy C. Moors's work include Marriage and Sexual Relationships (33 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (25 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (16 papers). Amy C. Moors is often cited by papers focused on Marriage and Sexual Relationships (33 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (25 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (16 papers). Amy C. Moors collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Czechia. Amy C. Moors's co-authors include Terri D. Conley, Ali Ziegler, Jes L. Matsick, William J. Chopik, Jennifer D. Rubin, Robin S. Edelstein, Amanda N. Gesselman, Justin R. Garcia, Helen Fisher and Britney M. Wardecker and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Amy C. Moors

53 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amy C. Moors United States 27 1.7k 1.1k 1000 412 292 53 2.2k
Jes L. Matsick United States 18 1.1k 0.6× 741 0.7× 636 0.6× 202 0.5× 120 0.4× 44 1.4k
Justin J. Lehmiller United States 20 769 0.5× 694 0.6× 577 0.6× 79 0.2× 157 0.5× 40 1.4k
Amanda N. Gesselman United States 20 565 0.3× 449 0.4× 643 0.6× 64 0.2× 234 0.8× 73 1.4k
W. Larry Ventis United States 14 1.4k 0.8× 947 0.9× 486 0.5× 44 0.1× 111 0.4× 20 2.4k
John Kitchener Sakaluk Canada 16 321 0.2× 349 0.3× 365 0.4× 29 0.1× 151 0.5× 39 881
Justin A. Lavner United States 26 752 0.4× 1.3k 1.2× 753 0.8× 17 0.0× 213 0.7× 96 2.0k
Stephanie D. Madsen United States 19 800 0.5× 777 0.7× 1.0k 1.0× 14 0.0× 175 0.6× 25 1.8k
Amy Rauer United States 18 341 0.2× 502 0.5× 308 0.3× 49 0.1× 172 0.6× 61 946
Suzanne Bartle‐Haring United States 26 553 0.3× 989 0.9× 928 0.9× 11 0.0× 153 0.5× 77 1.8k
Rona Abramovitch Canada 26 407 0.2× 406 0.4× 699 0.7× 25 0.1× 303 1.0× 53 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Amy C. Moors

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy C. Moors's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy C. Moors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy C. Moors more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy C. Moors

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy C. Moors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy C. Moors. The network helps show where Amy C. Moors may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy C. Moors

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy C. Moors. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy C. Moors based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy C. Moors. Amy C. Moors is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Liu, Sabrina R., et al.. (2025). The QUIC-SP: A Spanish language tool assessing unpredictability in early life is linked to physical and mental health. PLoS ONE. 20(1). e0298296–e0298296. 2 indexed citations
2.
Rodrigues, David L., et al.. (2024). Perceived Social Support Buffers the Consequences of Internalized Negativity Among Individuals in Consensual Non-Monogamous Relationships. The Journal of Sex Research. 63(1). 10–20. 1 indexed citations
3.
Moors, Amy C., et al.. (2024). Advancing consensual non‐monogamy in psychological research, practice, and policy: A guide for psychologists. Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University). 19(1). 3 indexed citations
4.
Anderson, Jared R., et al.. (2023). Understanding Relationship Labels: A Content Analysis of Consensual Non-monogamous Relationship Agreements. Sexuality & Culture. 28(2). 710–732. 6 indexed citations
5.
Moors, Amy C., Abigail J. Stewart, & Janet E. Malley. (2022). Gendered Impact of Caregiving Responsibilities on Tenure Track Faculty Parents’ Professional Lives. Sex Roles. 87(9-10). 498–514. 12 indexed citations
6.
7.
Chopik, William J., et al.. (2022). Individual difference predictors of starting a new romantic relationship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences. 201. 111919–111919. 7 indexed citations
8.
Moors, Amy C., Amanda N. Gesselman, & Justin R. Garcia. (2021). Desire, Familiarity, and Engagement in Polyamory: Results From a National Sample of Single Adults in the United States. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 619640–619640. 36 indexed citations
9.
Moors, Amy C., et al.. (2021). Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity and Relationship Quality Among People Engaged in Polyamory, Swinging, and Open Relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50(4). 1389–1400. 26 indexed citations
10.
Chopik, William J., et al.. (2020). Longitudinal associations between prenatal testosterone and postpartum outcomes in a sample of first-time expectant lesbian couples. Hormones and Behavior. 125. 104810–104810. 4 indexed citations
11.
Conley, Terri D., Jes L. Matsick, Amy C. Moors, & Ali Ziegler. (2017). Investigation of Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 12(2). 205–232. 115 indexed citations
12.
Moors, Amy C., Dylan Selterman, & Terri D. Conley. (2017). Personality Correlates of Desire to Engage in Consensual Non-monogamy among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals. Journal of Bisexuality. 17(4). 418–434. 24 indexed citations
14.
Conley, Terri D., Jes L. Matsick, Amy C. Moors, Ali Ziegler, & Jennifer D. Rubin. (2015). Re-examining the effectiveness of monogamy as an STI-preventive strategy. Preventive Medicine. 78. 23–28. 33 indexed citations
15.
Ziegler, Ali, Jes L. Matsick, Amy C. Moors, Jennifer D. Rubin, & Terri D. Conley. (2014). Does Monogamy Harm Women? Deconstructing Monogamy with a Feminist Lens. Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University). 22(1). 12 indexed citations
16.
Rubin, Jennifer D., Amy C. Moors, Jes L. Matsick, Ali Ziegler, & Terri D. Conley. (2014). On the Margins: Considering Diversity among Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships. Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University). 22(1). 84 indexed citations
17.
Conley, Terri D. & Amy C. Moors. (2014). More Oxygen Please!: How Polyamorous Relationship Strategies Might Oxygenate Marriage. Psychological Inquiry. 25(1). 56–63. 39 indexed citations
18.
Moors, Amy C., Jes L. Matsick, Ali Ziegler, Jennifer D. Rubin, & Terri D. Conley. (2013). Stigma Toward Individuals Engaged in Consensual Nonmonogamy: Robust and Worthy of Additional Research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 13(1). 52–69. 86 indexed citations
19.
Conley, Terri D., et al.. (2012). Unfaithful Individuals are Less Likely to Practice Safer Sex Than Openly Nonmonogamous Individuals. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 9(6). 1559–1565. 73 indexed citations
20.
Toppino, Thomas C., et al.. (2009). Metacognitive control over the distribution of practice: When is spacing preferred?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 35(5). 1352–1358. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026