Amy Binner

1.3k total citations
16 papers, 180 citations indexed

About

Amy Binner is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amy Binner has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 180 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 10 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Amy Binner's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (7 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers). Amy Binner is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (7 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers). Amy Binner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Amy Binner's co-authors include Brett Day, Ian J. Bateman, Silvia Ferrini, Tomáš Baďura, Carlo Fezzi, Emma Coombes, Greg Smith, Brendan Fisher, Michael Burton and Emily Fitzherbert and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Amy Binner

16 papers receiving 173 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amy Binner United Kingdom	8	113	97	39	28	18	16	180
François Soulard Canada	4	145 1.3×	82 0.8×	63 1.6×	39 1.4×	15 0.8×	5	216
Amii R. Harwood United Kingdom	7	142 1.3×	95 1.0×	40 1.0×	29 1.0×	30 1.7×	7	240
Marcello Hernández‐Blanco Australia	7	140 1.2×	48 0.5×	53 1.4×	65 2.3×	28 1.6×	9	222
Alex Neidermeier Netherlands	3	110 1.0×	72 0.7×	25 0.6×	30 1.1×	6 0.3×	5	197
William Labiosa United States	8	107 0.9×	36 0.4×	39 1.0×	33 1.2×	14 0.8×	13	171
Bhopal Pandeya United Kingdom	7	282 2.5×	85 0.9×	62 1.6×	48 1.7×	26 1.4×	8	345
Mahesh Ramachandran United States	6	188 1.7×	208 2.1×	68 1.7×	33 1.2×	31 1.7×	7	313
Thomas Yatich Kenya	7	171 1.5×	43 0.4×	36 0.9×	50 1.8×	11 0.6×	9	257
Eugenio Figueroa Chile	7	83 0.7×	53 0.5×	27 0.7×	18 0.6×	22 1.2×	18	154
Sébastien Costedoat United States	8	244 2.2×	143 1.5×	51 1.3×	72 2.6×	11 0.6×	10	339

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Binner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Binner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Binner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Binner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Binner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Binner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Binner. The network helps show where Amy Binner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy Binner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy Binner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy Binner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy Binner. Amy Binner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Baker, D. James, Rebecca Wheeler, Amy Binner, et al.. (2025). Aligning strategic and participatory approaches to agri‐environment scheme design and implementation to enhance nature recovery outcomes. People and Nature. 7(2). 329–345. 3 indexed citations

Binner, Amy, et al.. (2025). Using the natural capital framework to integrate biodiversity into sustainable, efficient and equitable environmental-economic decision-making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 380(1917). 20230215–20230215. 3 indexed citations

Day, Brett, Ian J. Bateman, Amy Binner, et al.. (2024). Natural capital approaches for the optimal design of policies for nature recovery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 379(1903). 20220327–20220327. 9 indexed citations

Collins, Rebecca, Ben Balmford, Amy Binner, et al.. (2024). Biodiversity offsets perform poorly for both people and nature, but better approaches are available. One Earth. 7(12). 2165–2174. 2 indexed citations

Ritchie, Paul, Greg Smith, Katrina Davis, et al.. (2020). Shifts in national land use and food production in Great Britain after a climate tipping point. Nature Food. 1(1). 76–83. 37 indexed citations

Baďura, Tomáš, Silvia Ferrini, Michael Burton, Amy Binner, & Ian J. Bateman. (2019). A new approach to capturing the spatial dimensions of value within choice experiments. Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter). 1 indexed citations

Smith, Greg, Brett Day, & Amy Binner. (2019). Multiple-Purchaser Payments for Ecosystem Services: An Exploration Using Spatial Simulation Modelling. Environmental and Resource Economics. 74(1). 421–447. 7 indexed citations

Day, Brett, Ian J. Bateman, Amy Binner, Silvia Ferrini, & Carlo Fezzi. (2019). Structurally-consistent estimation of use and nonuse values for landscape-wide environmental change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 98. 102256–102256. 5 indexed citations

Baďura, Tomáš, Silvia Ferrini, Michael Burton, Amy Binner, & Ian J. Bateman. (2019). Using Individualised Choice Maps to Capture the Spatial Dimensions of Value Within Choice Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics. 75(2). 297–322. 22 indexed citations

10.

Davis, Katrina, Amy Binner, Andrew S. Bell, et al.. (2018). A generalisable integrated natural capital methodology for targeting investment in coastal defence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. 8(4). 429–446. 8 indexed citations

11.

Binner, Amy & Brett Day. (2017). How Property Markets Determine Welfare Outcomes: An Equilibrium Sorting Model Analysis of Local Environmental Interventions. Environmental and Resource Economics. 69(4). 733–761. 9 indexed citations

12.

Bateman, Ian J., Matthew Agarwala, Amy Binner, et al.. (2016). Spatially explicit integrated modeling and economic valuation of climate driven land use change and its indirect effects. Journal of Environmental Management. 181. 172–184. 27 indexed citations

13.

Elliott, Jennifer, et al.. (2015). Scoping the strengths and weaknesses of different auction and PES mechanisms for Countryside Stewardship. Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter). 1 indexed citations

14.

Bateman, Ian J., Emma Coombes, Emily Fitzherbert, et al.. (2015). Conserving tropical biodiversity via market forces and spatial targeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112(24). 7408–7413. 36 indexed citations

15.

Binner, Amy & Brett Day. (2014). Exploring mortgage interest deduction reforms: An equilibrium sorting model with endogenous tenure choice. Journal of Public Economics. 122. 40–54. 8 indexed citations

16.

Bateman, Ian J., Amy Binner, Emma Coombes, et al.. (2012). Integrated and spatially explicit modelling of the economic value of complex environmental change and its indirect effects. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact