Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A new insight into corrosion inhibition mechanism of copper in aerated 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution by eco-friendly Imidazopyrimidine Dye: experimental and theoretical approach
This map shows the geographic impact of Amrita Biswas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amrita Biswas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amrita Biswas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amrita Biswas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amrita Biswas. The network helps show where Amrita Biswas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amrita Biswas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amrita Biswas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amrita Biswas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amrita Biswas. Amrita Biswas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Biswas, Amrita, et al.. (2013). Identity of Colletotrichum infections in large cardamom ( Amomum subulatum Roxb.). Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops. 22(1). 101–103.6 indexed citations
10.
Biswas, Amrita, et al.. (2013). Yield loss of large cardamom ( Amomum subulatum Roxb.) due to Colletotrichum blight in Sikkim. Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops. 22(2). 215–218.3 indexed citations
11.
Biswas, Amrita, et al.. (2012). In vitro evaluation of biocontrol agents, botanicals and fungicides against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infecting large cardamom. Plant Disease Research. 27(1). 49–53.2 indexed citations
12.
Biswas, Amrita, et al.. (2012). Incidence of Phoma leaf spot disease of large cardamom ( Amomum subulatum Roxb.) and in vitro evaluation of fungicides against the pathogen. Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops. 20(2). 86–88.4 indexed citations
Biswas, Amrita. (2007). Evaluation of Neem Formulations Against Sheath Blight Disease of Rice. Indian journal of plant protection. 35(2). 296–298.1 indexed citations
15.
Biswas, Amrita & A. K. Paul. (2007). Poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid) production by moderately halophilic heterotrophic bacteria.. Journal of Mycopathological research. 45(1). 139–144.1 indexed citations
16.
Biswas, Amrita. (2007). Bioefficacy of some new fungicides in management of Alternaria blight disease of rapeseed - Mustard. 31(10). 33–41.3 indexed citations
17.
Saha, Archita, Aparna Gomes, Biplab Giri, et al.. (2006). Occurrence of non-protein low molecular weight cardiotoxin in Indian King Cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) Cantor 1836, venom.. PubMed. 44(4). 279–85.4 indexed citations
18.
Biswas, Amrita, et al.. (2006). Genetic divergence for yield and its contributing traits in some rice genotypes (Oryza sativa L.) grown in Zn-deficient soil.. Journal of Crop and Weed. 2(2). 14–16.1 indexed citations
Biswas, Amrita, H. N. Acharya, & Bodhaditya Das. (1994). Nd-doped silica glasses by sol-gel method: effect of aluminium co-doping. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Physics. 32(4). 358–360.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.