Amos Bick

859 total citations
36 papers, 727 citations indexed

About

Amos Bick is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Pollution. According to data from OpenAlex, Amos Bick has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 727 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Water Science and Technology, 13 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and 8 papers in Pollution. Recurrent topics in Amos Bick's work include Membrane Separation Technologies (26 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (12 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (8 papers). Amos Bick is often cited by papers focused on Membrane Separation Technologies (26 papers), Wastewater Treatment and Reuse (12 papers) and Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (8 papers). Amos Bick collaborates with scholars based in Israel, China and United States. Amos Bick's co-authors include Gideon Oron, Fei Yang, Ying Wang, Moshe Herzberg, Leonid Gillerman, Yossi Manor, Asher Brenner, Amer Sweity, Mohammed S. Ali-Shtayeh and J. Hagin and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Water Research and Journal of Hazardous Materials.

In The Last Decade

Amos Bick

36 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amos Bick Israel 13 541 271 181 158 75 36 727
Yuwei Zhu China 16 515 1.0× 189 0.7× 252 1.4× 279 1.8× 67 0.9× 22 801
Jean Leclerc France 13 424 0.8× 230 0.8× 94 0.5× 141 0.9× 89 1.2× 38 936
D. Hadjiev France 12 311 0.6× 195 0.7× 69 0.4× 145 0.9× 63 0.8× 21 612
Harry Seah Singapore 15 669 1.2× 399 1.5× 209 1.2× 182 1.2× 107 1.4× 35 837
Sergio G. Salinas-Rodríguez Netherlands 17 507 0.9× 269 1.0× 103 0.6× 87 0.6× 127 1.7× 42 698
Shihu Shu China 11 411 0.8× 290 1.1× 265 1.5× 262 1.7× 219 2.9× 41 854
Benjamin Jurcik China 8 570 1.1× 170 0.6× 331 1.8× 264 1.7× 67 0.9× 9 871
V. Díez Spain 14 465 0.9× 249 0.9× 226 1.2× 138 0.9× 100 1.3× 23 679
A. Fenu Belgium 13 461 0.9× 185 0.7× 370 2.0× 173 1.1× 103 1.4× 19 742
J.H.J.M. van der Graaf Netherlands 17 777 1.4× 403 1.5× 394 2.2× 306 1.9× 92 1.2× 57 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Amos Bick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amos Bick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amos Bick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amos Bick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amos Bick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amos Bick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amos Bick. The network helps show where Amos Bick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amos Bick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amos Bick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amos Bick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amos Bick. Amos Bick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oron, Gideon, et al.. (2023). Modeling of spiral wound ultrafiltration membrane forward flushing during secondary wastewater upgrading for unrestricted irrigation. Desalination. 573. 117129–117129. 3 indexed citations
2.
Lew, Beni, et al.. (2019). Exploratory ranking analysis of brackish groundwater desalination for sustainable agricultural production: A case study of the Arava Valley in Israel. Journal of Arid Environments. 174. 104078–104078. 9 indexed citations
3.
Oron, Gideon, et al.. (2013). Nanotechnology processes for low quality waters polishing for sustainable agriculture production and groundwater protection.. Fresenius environmental bulletin. 22(7). 1929–1932. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bick, Amos & Gideon Oron. (2012). Boron removal from seawater reverse osmosis permeate: A Hasse diagram analysis of current technologies. Desalination. 310. 34–38. 6 indexed citations
5.
Raveh, Adi, et al.. (2011). Pretreatment of wastewater: Optimal coagulant selection using Partial Order Scaling Analysis (POSA). Journal of Hazardous Materials. 190(1-3). 51–59. 10 indexed citations
6.
Sweity, Amer, Ying Wang, Mohammed S. Ali-Shtayeh, et al.. (2011). Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D. Water Research. 45(19). 6430–6440. 132 indexed citations
7.
Bick, Amos & Gideon Oron. (2011). The use of computer aided techniques for revere osmosis desalination layout design. Desalination and Water Treatment. 31(1-3). 305–310. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bick, Amos, et al.. (2011). Multi-Dimension Scaling as an exploratory tool in the analysis of an immersed membrane bioreactor. Membrane Water Treatment. 2(2). 105–119. 2 indexed citations
9.
Yang, Fei, Ying Wang, Amos Bick, et al.. (2011). Performance of different configurations of hybrid growth membrane bioreactor (HG-MBR) for treatment of mixed wastewater. Desalination. 284. 261–268. 33 indexed citations
10.
Yang, Fei, Ying Wang, Amos Bick, Asher Brenner, & Gideon Oron. (2009). A long-term application of a pilot airlift membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment. 4(1-3). 212–217. 5 indexed citations
11.
Oron, Gideon, et al.. (2008). Membrane technology for sustainable treated wastewater reuse: agricultural, environmental and hydrological considerations. Water Science & Technology. 57(9). 1383–1388. 17 indexed citations
12.
Oron, Gideon, et al.. (2007). Advanced low quality waters treatment for unrestricted use purposes: imminent challenges. Desalination. 213(1-3). 189–198. 19 indexed citations
13.
Oron, Gideon, et al.. (2007). Membrane technology for advanced wastewater reclamation for sustainable agriculture production. Desalination. 218(1-3). 170–180. 52 indexed citations
14.
Oron, Gideon, et al.. (2006). A two stage membrane treatment of secondary effluent for unrestricted reuse and sustainable agricultural production. Desalination. 187(1-3). 335–345. 25 indexed citations
15.
Bick, Amos, et al.. (2005). Immersed Membrane BioReactor (IMBR) for treatment of combined domestic and dairy wastewater in an isolated farm. Water Science & Technology. 51(10). 327–334. 8 indexed citations
17.
Oron, Gideon, Amos Bick, Leonid Gillerman, & Y. Manor. (2004). Hybrid membrane systems for secondary effluent polishing for unrestricted reuse for agricultural irrigation. Water Science & Technology. 50(6). 305–312. 13 indexed citations
18.
Bick, Amos & Gideon Oron. (2001). Assessing the linkage between feed water quality and reverse osmosis membrane performance. Desalination. 137(1-3). 141–148. 12 indexed citations
19.
Oron, Gideon & Amos Bick. (2000). Optimal membrane selection for Brackish water desalination. Water Science & Technology. 41(10-11). 165–171. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bick, Amos & Gideon Oron. (2000). Desalination technology for optimal renovation of saline groundwater in a natural reservoir. Desalination. 131(1-3). 97–104. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026