Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Dynamics of land use and land cover change (LULCC) using geospatial techniques: a case study of Islamabad Pakistan
2016324 citationsZahra Mohammed Hassan, Rabia Shabbir et al.SpringerPlusprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Amir Haider Malik
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Amir Haider Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amir Haider Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amir Haider Malik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amir Haider Malik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amir Haider Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amir Haider Malik. The network helps show where Amir Haider Malik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amir Haider Malik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amir Haider Malik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amir Haider Malik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amir Haider Malik. Amir Haider Malik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Hassan, Zahra Mohammed, Rabia Shabbir, Sheikh Saeed Ahmad, et al.. (2016). Dynamics of land use and land cover change (LULCC) using geospatial techniques: a case study of Islamabad Pakistan. SpringerPlus. 5(1). 812–812.324 indexed citations breakdown →
Irshad, Muhammad, et al.. (2013). Characterization of Heavy Metals in Livestock Manures. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 22(4).38 indexed citations
Hassan, Mujtaba, et al.. (2013). Air pollution Monitoring in Urban Areas due to Heavy Transportation and Industries: a Case Study of Rawalpindi and Islamabad.9 indexed citations
8.
Iqbal, Muhammad Farooq, Mobushir Riaz Khan, & Amir Haider Malik. (2013). Land use change detection in the limestone exploitation area of Margalla Hills National Park (MHNP), Islamabad, Pakistan using geo-spatial techniques. 46(1). 89–98.10 indexed citations
9.
Maqbool, Farhana, et al.. (2012). Application of regression model on stream water quality parameters.. The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 49(1). 95–100.8 indexed citations
Zeb, Bibi Saima, Amir Haider Malik, Amir Waseem, & Qaisar Mahmood. (2011). Water quality assessment of Siran river, Pakistan. International Journal of the Physical Sciences. 6(34). 7789–7798.28 indexed citations
Malik, Amir Haider. (1998). Sustainable groundwater exploitation of the Lei-Basin. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.