Amelia Sancilio
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Physiology
- General Health Professions
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Catherine Panter‐BrickMark EggermanThomas W. McDadeRana DajaniAlexis R. DemonbreunElizabeth M. McNallyRichard T. D’AquilaDavid A. Raichlen
- Topics
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (10 papers)COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers)SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPoland
In The Last Decade
Amelia Sancilio
22 papers receiving 562 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Infectious Diseases 158
- Clinical Psychology 137
- Physiology 72
- General Health Professions 69
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Amelia Sancilio
This map shows the geographic impact of Amelia Sancilio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelia Sancilio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelia Sancilio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amelia Sancilio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelia Sancilio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelia Sancilio. The network helps show where Amelia Sancilio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amelia Sancilio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amelia Sancilio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amelia Sancilio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amelia Sancilio. Amelia Sancilio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 44 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Hadza Hunter-Gatherers Exhibit Gender Differences in Space Use and Spatial Cognition Consistent with the Ecology of Male and Female Targeted Foods | 1 |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 86 | |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Amelia Sancilio
Amelia Sancilio is a scholar working on Aging, Infectious Diseases and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (10 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (21 citations), Infectious Diseases (158 citations) and Clinical Psychology (137 citations). Amelia Sancilio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Panter‐Brick, Mark Eggerman, Thomas W. McDade, Rana Dajani, Alexis R. Demonbreun, Elizabeth M. McNally, Richard T. D’Aquila, David A. Raichlen, Audax Mabulla and J. Colette Berbesque. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.