Amber Savage

1.2k citations
26 papers · 814 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Amber Savage

25 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

Amber Savage
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Clinical Psychology 536
  • Safety Research 85
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 191
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 118
  • Health 60
Replace Diane Hiebert‐Murphy with:
Diane Hiebert‐Murphy Canada
Catherine Wade Australia
Annette K. Griffith United States
Neal DeChillo United States
Paul E. Koren United States
Leandra Godoy United States
Sarah McCue Horwitz United States
Susan L. McCammon United States
Hilton Davis United Kingdom
Vashti Berry United Kingdom
Amber Savage relative to Diane Hiebert‐Murphy Canada Diane Hiebert‐Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Diane Hiebert‐Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Savage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Savage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Savage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Savage more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Savage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Savage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Savage. The network helps show where Amber Savage may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Amber Savage, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber Savage Line = papers co-authored together Amber Savage links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010171
2 2015103
3 201499
4 201450
5 201536
6 201435
7 201529
8 200429
9 201428
10 201827
11 201123
12 201922
13 202221
14 202220
15 201320
16 201419
17 200217
18 201114
19 201612
20 201510

About Amber Savage

Amber Savage is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (536 citations), Safety Research (85 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (191 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (118 citations) and Health (60 citations). Amber Savage has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David McConnell, Rhonda Breitkreuz, Eric Emerson, Gwynnyth Llewellyn, Dick Sobsey, Sandra Young, Carole A. Estabrooks, Lian C. T. Shoute, Glen R. Loppnow and Jude Spiers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Research in Developmental Disabilities, Journal of Child and Family Studies, Community Mental Health Journal and Disability & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact