Amber Reed

445 citations
22 papers · 347 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Amber Reed

22 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Amber Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 86
  • Materials Chemistry 192
  • Condensed Matter Physics 47
  • Mechanics of Materials 96
  • Biomedical Engineering 108
Replace Yu‐Wei Lin with:
Yu‐Wei Lin Taiwan
Fang Lin China
Tela Favaloro United States
Martin Knaut Germany
K. S. Liu Taiwan
Hongbo Qin China
K. Ganesan India
Hideki Nakazawa Japan
Antaryami Mohanta Switzerland
Kyoung‐Bo Kim South Korea
Amber Reed relative to Yu‐Wei Lin Taiwan Yu‐Wei Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Yu‐Wei Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Reed. The network helps show where Amber Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amber Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amber Reed Line = papers co-authored together Amber Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201756
2 201341
3 201737
4 202224
5 202122
6 201822
7 202017
8 201817
9 202016
10 201516
11 201215
12 200814
13 201311
14 201610
15 20229
16 20226
17 20233
18 20203
19 20223
20 20212

About Amber Reed

Amber Reed is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (5 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (5 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers), Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (5 papers), Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices (4 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (3 papers), Multiferroics and related materials (3 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (86 citations), Materials Chemistry (192 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (47 citations), Mechanics of Materials (96 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (108 citations). Amber Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and India. Frequent co-authors include Andrey A. Voevodin, J.E. Bultman, Brandon M. Howe, Augustine Urbas, Sabyasachi Ganguli, C. Muratore, Baratunde A. Cola, Teri W. Odom, Shivashankar Vangala and Igor Zhirkov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films, Carbon, ACS Photonics, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact