Amanda R. Meier

596 total citations
9 papers, 373 citations indexed

About

Amanda R. Meier is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda R. Meier has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 373 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Plant Science, 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Amanda R. Meier's work include Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). Amanda R. Meier is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). Amanda R. Meier collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Amanda R. Meier's co-authors include Mark D. Hunter, William E. Snyder, Michael S. Crossley, Matthew D. Moran, Sofia Varriano, G. L. Hartman, David H. Nichols, Olivia M. Smith, Doris Lagos‐Kutz and David W. Crowder and has published in prestigious journals such as Global Change Biology, Journal of Animal Ecology and Oikos.

In The Last Decade

Amanda R. Meier

9 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda R. Meier United States 7 159 143 93 86 85 9 373
Ian Ondo United Kingdom 9 148 0.9× 139 1.0× 61 0.7× 33 0.4× 81 1.0× 13 333
Hsun‐Yi Hsieh United States 4 146 0.9× 80 0.6× 38 0.4× 65 0.8× 122 1.4× 5 321
Mario Herrera France 6 69 0.4× 126 0.9× 49 0.5× 117 1.4× 50 0.6× 9 332
Roberto Reynoso Santos Mexico 5 123 0.8× 102 0.7× 41 0.4× 62 0.7× 95 1.1× 16 370
Nathan L. Haan United States 9 199 1.3× 97 0.7× 40 0.4× 150 1.7× 101 1.2× 19 342
Linda Marín United States 9 129 0.8× 114 0.8× 26 0.3× 76 0.9× 64 0.8× 12 296
Varun Varma United Kingdom 10 163 1.0× 195 1.4× 53 0.6× 77 0.9× 135 1.6× 16 439
Gábor Pozsgai Portugal 11 108 0.7× 107 0.7× 48 0.5× 168 2.0× 98 1.2× 43 379
Odile T. Bruggisser Switzerland 9 239 1.5× 125 0.9× 37 0.4× 143 1.7× 130 1.5× 12 362
Elissa M. Olimpi United States 12 109 0.7× 102 0.7× 44 0.5× 59 0.7× 80 0.9× 22 360

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda R. Meier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda R. Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda R. Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda R. Meier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda R. Meier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda R. Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda R. Meier. The network helps show where Amanda R. Meier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda R. Meier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda R. Meier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda R. Meier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda R. Meier. Amanda R. Meier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Crossley, Michael S., Olivia M. Smith, Jeffrey Glassberg, et al.. (2021). Recent climate change is creating hotspots of butterfly increase and decline across North America. Global Change Biology. 27(12). 2702–2714. 45 indexed citations
2.
Meier, Amanda R. & Mark D. Hunter. (2021). Variable effects of mycorrhizal fungi on predator–prey dynamics under field conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology. 90(5). 1341–1352. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fu, Zhen, Amanda R. Meier, Brendan Epstein, et al.. (2020). Host plants and Wolbachia shape the population genetics of sympatric herbivore populations. Evolutionary Applications. 13(10). 2740–2753. 16 indexed citations
4.
Crossley, Michael S., Amanda R. Meier, G. L. Hartman, et al.. (2020). No net insect abundance and diversity declines across US Long Term Ecological Research sites. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4(10). 1368–1376. 139 indexed citations
5.
Crossley, Michael S., et al.. (2020). Exposure to predators, but not intraspecific competitors, heightens herbivore susceptibility to entomopathogens. Biological Control. 151. 104403–104403. 4 indexed citations
6.
Meier, Amanda R. & Mark D. Hunter. (2019). Mycorrhizae Alter Constitutive and Herbivore-Induced Volatile Emissions by Milkweeds. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 45(7). 610–625. 30 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Olivia M., Abigail Cohen, Joseph Taylor, et al.. (2019). Organic Farming Provides Reliable Environmental Benefits but Increases Variability in Crop Yields: A Global Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 3. 98 indexed citations
8.
Meier, Amanda R. & Mark D. Hunter. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mediate herbivore‐induction of plant defenses differently above and belowground. Oikos. 127(12). 1759–1775. 30 indexed citations
9.
Meier, Amanda R. & Mark D. Hunter. (2018). Mycorrhizae Alter Toxin Sequestration and Performance of Two Specialist Herbivores. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 6. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026