Amanda M. Bishop

45 total papers · 1.1k total citations
35 papers, 766 citations indexed

About

Amanda M. Bishop is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda M. Bishop has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 766 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Ecology, 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 8 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Amanda M. Bishop's work include Marine animal studies overview (19 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers). Amanda M. Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Marine animal studies overview (19 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (6 papers). Amanda M. Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Falkland Islands. Amanda M. Bishop's co-authors include Dana Boyd Barr, Leila K. Needham, Antonia M. Calafat, Larry L. Needham, Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik, Xiaoyun Ye, Vladimir Laptikhovsky, Paul Brickle, Sean D. Twiss and Patrick P. Pomeroy and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Amanda M. Bishop

33 papers receiving 735 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Amanda M. Bishop 270 143 110 83 78 35 766
Zheng Huang 261 1.0× 71 0.5× 47 0.4× 44 0.5× 71 0.9× 45 899
Ruey‐Shing Lin 211 0.8× 186 1.3× 43 0.4× 116 1.4× 54 0.7× 50 733
M. Monirul H. Khan 65 0.2× 138 1.0× 65 0.6× 112 1.3× 54 0.7× 43 813
John P. Buchweitz 186 0.7× 101 0.7× 103 0.9× 68 0.8× 22 0.3× 67 823
Yimeng Liu 85 0.3× 151 1.1× 157 1.4× 23 0.3× 62 0.8× 61 838
Sanjay Pandey 228 0.8× 29 0.2× 32 0.3× 44 0.5× 32 0.4× 76 653
Mark S. Okihiro 286 1.1× 138 1.0× 29 0.3× 144 1.7× 61 0.8× 32 714
Kirsti Rouvinen‐Watt 370 1.4× 241 1.7× 86 0.8× 21 0.3× 15 0.2× 40 858
Élida G. Campos 132 0.5× 305 2.1× 113 1.0× 15 0.2× 76 1.0× 26 737
G. T. Goodman 156 0.6× 122 0.9× 31 0.3× 29 0.3× 18 0.2× 27 768

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Bishop. The network helps show where Amanda M. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda M. Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda M. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda M. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda M. Bishop. Amanda M. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026