Amanda E. Calvert

881 total citations
25 papers, 582 citations indexed

About

Amanda E. Calvert is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda E. Calvert has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 582 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Infectious Diseases, 22 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Amanda E. Calvert's work include Viral Infections and Vectors (23 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (22 papers) and Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (9 papers). Amanda E. Calvert is often cited by papers focused on Viral Infections and Vectors (23 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (22 papers) and Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (9 papers). Amanda E. Calvert collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and South Korea. Amanda E. Calvert's co-authors include John T. Roehrig, Claire Y.‐H. Huang, Carol D. Blair, Richard M. Kinney, Siritorn Butrapet, Aaron C. Brault, Brad J. Biggerstaff, Shawn J. Silengo, Robert S. Lanciotti and Nathan A. Tanner and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Emerging infectious diseases.

In The Last Decade

Amanda E. Calvert

24 papers receiving 565 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda E. Calvert United States 14 462 449 88 74 73 25 582
Martin Faye Senegal 11 221 0.5× 253 0.6× 43 0.5× 110 1.5× 119 1.6× 50 453
Sandro Patroca da Silva Brazil 14 430 0.9× 387 0.9× 153 1.7× 72 1.0× 48 0.7× 89 617
Jamie McMahon Australia 14 442 1.0× 379 0.8× 23 0.3× 60 0.8× 28 0.4× 34 572
Chuan Chin Taiwan 13 642 1.4× 554 1.2× 12 0.1× 71 1.0× 49 0.7× 16 701
Alex Pauvolid‐Corrêa Brazil 14 377 0.8× 581 1.3× 78 0.9× 29 0.4× 13 0.2× 34 672
Kridsada Chaichoun Thailand 10 128 0.3× 195 0.4× 41 0.5× 134 1.8× 57 0.8× 22 394
Ladslav Moonga Zambia 13 141 0.3× 254 0.6× 89 1.0× 183 2.5× 15 0.2× 31 437
Hsiao‐Fen Grace Chang United States 12 94 0.2× 205 0.5× 63 0.7× 75 1.0× 55 0.8× 14 457
Aunyaratana Thontiravong Thailand 12 259 0.6× 325 0.7× 39 0.4× 248 3.4× 25 0.3× 40 500
Dylan Ehrbar United States 14 413 0.9× 379 0.8× 10 0.1× 35 0.5× 53 0.7× 30 661

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda E. Calvert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda E. Calvert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda E. Calvert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda E. Calvert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda E. Calvert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda E. Calvert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda E. Calvert. The network helps show where Amanda E. Calvert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda E. Calvert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda E. Calvert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda E. Calvert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda E. Calvert. Amanda E. Calvert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Goodman, Christin H., Holly R. Hughes, Brad J. Biggerstaff, et al.. (2024). Development of a Diagnostic IgM Antibody Capture ELISA for Detection of Anti-Cache Valley Virus Human IgM. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 112(2). 386–395. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hughes, Holly R., Joan L. Kenney, & Amanda E. Calvert. (2023). Cache Valley virus: an emerging arbovirus of public and veterinary health importance. Journal of Medical Entomology. 60(6). 1230–1241. 10 indexed citations
4.
Davis, Brent S., et al.. (2022). Monoclonal antibodies to Cache Valley virus for serological diagnosis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 16(1). e0010156–e0010156. 4 indexed citations
6.
Basile, Alison Jane, Kalanthe Horiuchi, Christin H. Goodman, et al.. (2020). Development of diagnostic microsphere-based immunoassays for Heartland virus. Journal of Clinical Virology. 134. 104693–104693. 6 indexed citations
7.
8.
Calvert, Amanda E., Joseph Piper, Brett A. Thibodeaux, et al.. (2016). A humanized monoclonal antibody neutralizes yellow fever virus strain 17D-204 in vitro but does not protect a mouse model from disease. Antiviral Research. 131. 92–99. 7 indexed citations
9.
Bosco‐Lauth, Angela M., Amanda E. Calvert, J. Jeffrey Root, et al.. (2016). Vertebrate Host Susceptibility to Heartland Virus. Emerging infectious diseases. 22(12). 2070–2077. 40 indexed citations
10.
Calvert, Amanda E. & Aaron C. Brault. (2015). Development and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed Against the Nucleoprotein of Heartland Virus. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 93(6). 1338–1340. 14 indexed citations
11.
Lambert, Amy J., Jason O. Velez, Aaron C. Brault, et al.. (2015). Molecular, serological and in vitro culture-based characterization of Bourbon virus, a newly described human pathogen of the genus Thogotovirus. Journal of Clinical Virology. 73. 127–132. 52 indexed citations
12.
Roehrig, John T., Siritorn Butrapet, Nathan M. Liss, et al.. (2013). Mutation of the dengue virus type 2 envelope protein heparan sulfate binding sites or the domain III lateral ridge blocks replication in Vero cells prior to membrane fusion. Virology. 441(2). 114–125. 40 indexed citations
14.
Calvert, Amanda E., Claire Y.‐H. Huang, Carol D. Blair, & John T. Roehrig. (2012). Mutations in the West Nile prM protein affect VLP and virion secretion in vitro. Virology. 433(1). 35–44. 14 indexed citations
15.
Butrapet, Siritorn, Kelley J. Moss, Amanda E. Calvert, et al.. (2011). Amino acid changes within the E protein hinge region that affect dengue virus type 2 infectivity and fusion. Virology. 413(1). 118–127. 44 indexed citations
16.
Calvert, Amanda E., et al.. (2010). Human monoclonal antibodies to West Nile virus identify epitopes on the prM protein. Virology. 410(1). 30–37. 16 indexed citations
17.
Butrapet, Siritorn, Kelley J. Moss, Amanda E. Calvert, et al.. (2010). Domain-III FG loop of the dengue virus type 2 envelope protein is important for infection of mammalian cells and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Virology. 406(2). 328–335. 38 indexed citations
18.
Huang, Claire Y.‐H., Siritorn Butrapet, Amanda E. Calvert, et al.. (2009). The dengue virus type 2 envelope protein fusion peptide is essential for membrane fusion. Virology. 396(2). 305–315. 64 indexed citations
19.
Bryant, Juliet E., Amanda E. Calvert, Mary B. Crabtree, et al.. (2007). Glycosylation of the dengue 2 virus E protein at N67 is critical for virus growth in vitro but not for growth in intrathoracically inoculated Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Virology. 366(2). 415–423. 59 indexed citations
20.
Calvert, Amanda E., Claire Y.‐H. Huang, Richard M. Kinney, & John T. Roehrig. (2006). Non-structural proteins of dengue 2 virus offer limited protection to interferon-deficient mice after dengue 2 virus challenge. Journal of General Virology. 87(2). 339–346. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026