A.M. Harper

2.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
36 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

A.M. Harper is a scholar working on Surgery, Hepatology and Transplantation. According to data from OpenAlex, A.M. Harper has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Surgery, 15 papers in Hepatology and 11 papers in Transplantation. Recurrent topics in A.M. Harper's work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (20 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (14 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (10 papers). A.M. Harper is often cited by papers focused on Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (20 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (14 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (10 papers). A.M. Harper collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. A.M. Harper's co-authors include Erik Edwards, Ajay K. Israni, Jon J. Snyder, M.A. Skeans, Jodi M. Smith, B.L. Kasiske, W. Ray Kim, Richard B. Freeman, David P. Schladt and J.L. Wainright and has published in prestigious journals such as Gut, British journal of surgery and American Journal of Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

A.M. Harper

34 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Liver 2017 2026 2020 2023 2018 2017 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A.M. Harper United States 21 1.4k 1.3k 781 441 303 36 2.1k
Randeep Kashyap United States 25 1.2k 0.8× 1.3k 1.0× 594 0.8× 533 1.2× 201 0.7× 53 2.1k
Allison J. Kwong United States 19 1.4k 1.0× 1.1k 0.8× 1.0k 1.3× 326 0.7× 233 0.8× 88 2.1k
Amit D. Tevar United States 28 618 0.4× 979 0.8× 478 0.6× 784 1.8× 318 1.0× 105 2.3k
Abbas Rana United States 27 1.7k 1.2× 2.0k 1.5× 1.0k 1.3× 785 1.8× 450 1.5× 143 3.1k
Gyu‐Seong Choi South Korea 26 1.5k 1.1× 1.4k 1.1× 735 0.9× 169 0.4× 269 0.9× 212 2.5k
Anton Skaro United States 29 1.4k 1.0× 1.6k 1.2× 498 0.6× 762 1.7× 653 2.2× 76 2.6k
Wallis Marsh United States 21 1.3k 1.0× 1.3k 1.0× 659 0.8× 258 0.6× 100 0.3× 36 2.2k
C. Burcin Taner United States 31 1.8k 1.3× 2.1k 1.6× 482 0.6× 522 1.2× 758 2.5× 134 2.6k
Sylvester M. Black United States 22 511 0.4× 807 0.6× 315 0.4× 257 0.6× 117 0.4× 112 1.4k
Adnan Said United States 30 1.4k 1.0× 989 0.8× 1.4k 1.8× 130 0.3× 183 0.6× 86 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by A.M. Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.M. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.M. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.M. Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.M. Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.M. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.M. Harper. The network helps show where A.M. Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.M. Harper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.M. Harper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.M. Harper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.M. Harper. A.M. Harper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Jodi M., Tim Weaver, M.A. Skeans, et al.. (2018). OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Intestine. American Journal of Transplantation. 18. 254–290. 35 indexed citations
2.
Kim, W. Ray, John R. Lake, Jodi M. Smith, et al.. (2018). OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Liver. American Journal of Transplantation. 18. 172–253. 288 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Kim, W. Ray, John R. Lake, Jodi M. Smith, et al.. (2017). OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Liver. American Journal of Transplantation. 17. 174–251. 225 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Smith, Jodi M., M.A. Skeans, Simon Horslen, et al.. (2017). OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Intestine. American Journal of Transplantation. 17. 252–285. 24 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Joseph M., M.A. Skeans, Simon Horslen, et al.. (2016). Intestine. American Journal of Transplantation. 16. 99–114. 9 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Jodi M., M.A. Skeans, Simon Horslen, et al.. (2015). OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Intestine. American Journal of Transplantation. 15. 1–16. 36 indexed citations
7.
Kim, W. Ray, John R. Lake, Jodi M. Smith, et al.. (2015). OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Liver. American Journal of Transplantation. 15. 1–28. 261 indexed citations
8.
Kim, W. Ray, Jodi M. Smith, M.A. Skeans, et al.. (2013). OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report: Liver. American Journal of Transplantation. 14. 69–96. 171 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Jodi M., M.A. Skeans, Simon Horslen, et al.. (2013). OPTN/SRTR 2012 Annual Data Report: Intestine. American Journal of Transplantation. 14. 97–111. 24 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Jodi M., Scott W. Biggins, W. Ray Kim, et al.. (2012). Kidney, Pancreas and Liver Allocation and Distribution in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation. 12(12). 3191–3212. 77 indexed citations
11.
Kim, W. Ray, Peter G. Stock, Jodi M. Smith, et al.. (2012). OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: Liver. American Journal of Transplantation. 13. 73–102. 136 indexed citations
12.
Guiteau, Jacfranz J., Ronald T. Cotton, W. Kenneth Washburn, et al.. (2010). An Early Regional Experience with Expansion of Milan Criteria for Liver Transplant Recipients. American Journal of Transplantation. 10(9). 2092–2098. 35 indexed citations
13.
Washburn, Kenneth, E. Edwards, A.M. Harper, & Richard B. Freeman. (2010). Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Are Advantaged in the Current Liver Transplant Allocation System. American Journal of Transplantation. 10(7). 1652–1657. 179 indexed citations
14.
Sharma, Pratima, A.M. Harper, Jose Luis Hernández‐Davó, et al.. (2006). Reduced Priority MELD Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Does Not Adversely Impact Candidate Survival Awaiting Liver Transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation. 6(8). 1957–1962. 39 indexed citations
15.
Freeman, Richard B., Erik Edwards, & A.M. Harper. (2006). Waiting List Removal Rates Among Patients with Chronic and Malignant Liver Diseases. American Journal of Transplantation. 6(6). 1416–1421. 155 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, Richard B., A.M. Harper, & Erik Edwards. (2005). Excellent Liver Transplant Survival Rates Under the MELD/PELD System. Transplantation Proceedings. 37(2). 585–588. 31 indexed citations
17.
Bhat, Krishna, A.M. Harper, & Stephen Gorard. (2002). Perceived food and drug allergies in functional and organic gastrointestinal disorders. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 16(5). 969–973. 31 indexed citations
18.
Bhat, Kumar M. R., A.M. Harper, & Stephen Gorard. (2001). 157. PREVALENCE OF PERCEIVED FOOD AND DRUG ALLERGIES IN FUNCTIONAL AND ORGANIC GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS. Gut. 48(suppl 1). A43–A47. 3 indexed citations
19.
Taranto, Silvia, A.M. Harper, Erik Edwards, et al.. (2000). Developing a national allocation model for cadaveric kidneys. Winter Simulation Conference. 2. 1971–1977. 18 indexed citations
20.
Harper, A.M., et al.. (1992). SPECIFICATION FOR MAJOR PROJECTS. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026