AM Friedman

679 total citations
8 papers, 470 citations indexed

About

AM Friedman is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, AM Friedman has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 470 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 6 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in AM Friedman's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (4 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). AM Friedman is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (4 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). AM Friedman collaborates with scholars based in United States. AM Friedman's co-authors include CV Ananth, JD Wright, Jessica A. Lavery, Zainab Siddiq, Moeun Son, Ronald J. Wapner, Cynthia Gyamfi‐Bannerman, Sarah A. Keim and MA Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

AM Friedman

8 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
AM Friedman United States 8 319 241 95 88 57 8 470
Osman Aşıcıoğlu Türkiye 15 307 1.0× 289 1.2× 137 1.4× 116 1.3× 24 0.4× 38 586
Cynthia Gyamfi United States 15 263 0.8× 354 1.5× 62 0.7× 230 2.6× 96 1.7× 38 565
L. Eslamian Iran 12 223 0.7× 253 1.0× 153 1.6× 99 1.1× 27 0.5× 48 489
Christopher Goodier United States 7 106 0.3× 79 0.3× 72 0.8× 81 0.9× 27 0.5× 14 319
Irene Stafford United States 7 244 0.8× 294 1.2× 46 0.5× 112 1.3× 17 0.3× 10 408
Diana R. Danilenko-Dixon United States 7 205 0.6× 120 0.5× 114 1.2× 34 0.4× 18 0.3× 12 386
Carmen Regan Ireland 9 181 0.6× 138 0.6× 22 0.2× 39 0.4× 12 0.2× 18 436
P. J. Lewis United Kingdom 13 132 0.4× 176 0.7× 109 1.1× 75 0.9× 89 1.6× 24 508
A. J. England United Kingdom 9 156 0.5× 247 1.0× 129 1.4× 76 0.9× 42 0.7× 23 544
Sharon E. Abramovitz United States 12 103 0.3× 107 0.4× 126 1.3× 51 0.6× 23 0.4× 31 301

Countries citing papers authored by AM Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of AM Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by AM Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AM Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by AM Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by AM Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by AM Friedman. The network helps show where AM Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of AM Friedman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of AM Friedman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of AM Friedman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with AM Friedman. AM Friedman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Ananth, CV, et al.. (2017). Trends in operative vaginal delivery, 2005–2013: a population‐based study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 124(9). 1365–1372. 80 indexed citations
2.
Friedman, AM, et al.. (2016). Prolonged latency of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and neurodevelopmental outcomes: a secondary analysis. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 123(10). 1629–1635. 21 indexed citations
3.
Ananth, CV, Jessica A. Lavery, AM Friedman, Ronald J. Wapner, & JD Wright. (2016). Serious maternal complications in relation to severe pre‐eclampsia: a retrospective cohort study of the impact of hospital volume. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 124(8). 1246–1253. 24 indexed citations
4.
Lavery, Jessica A., et al.. (2016). Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal changes in prevalence rates between 1979 and 2010. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 124(5). 804–813. 225 indexed citations
5.
Ananth, CV, et al.. (2016). Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children in relation to placental abruption. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 124(3). 463–472. 20 indexed citations
6.
Ananth, CV, et al.. (2015). Clinical indication and timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration at a single centre. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 123(3). 409–414. 30 indexed citations
7.
Wright, JD, et al.. (2015). Hospital variation in maternal complications following caesarean delivery in the United States: 2006–2012. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 123(7). 1115–1120. 9 indexed citations
8.
Friedman, AM, et al.. (2015). A comparison of recommendations for pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis after caesarean delivery from three major guidelines. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 123(13). 2157–2162. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026