Allen G. Good
- Plant Science top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 0.5%
- Soil Science top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Perrin H. BeattyDouglas G. MuenchAshok K. ShrawatRudy DolferusKathleen P. IsmondGregory J. TaylorChandra H. McAllisterRebecka T. Carroll
- Topics
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (32 papers)Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (21 papers)Plant responses to water stress (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Allen G. Good
101 papers receiving 6.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Plant Science 5.7k
- Molecular Biology 1.9k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 771
- Soil Science 437
- Genetics 409
Countries citing papers authored by Allen G. Good
This map shows the geographic impact of Allen G. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allen G. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allen G. Good more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Allen G. Good
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allen G. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allen G. Good. The network helps show where Allen G. Good may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Allen G. Good
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Allen G. Good. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Allen G. Good based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Allen G. Good. Allen G. Good is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 57 | |
| 3 | Engineering nitrogen use efficient crop plants: the current statusbreakdown → | 306 |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | 136 | |
| 8 | 165 | |
| 9 | 223 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production?breakdown → | 655 |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 65 | |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | 64 | |
| 19 | 103 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Allen G. Good
Allen G. Good is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biochemistry and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 101 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (32 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (21 papers) and Plant responses to water stress (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (5.7k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (771 citations) and Soil Science (437 citations). Allen G. Good has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Perrin H. Beatty, Douglas G. Muench, Ashok K. Shrawat, Rudy Dolferus, Kathleen P. Ismond, Gregory J. Taylor, Chandra H. McAllister, Rebecka T. Carroll, Steven J. Rothstein and William L. Crosby. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Nucleic Acids Research and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.