Alexander Kreplin
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Atmospheric Science
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Co-authors
- Stefan KrausG. WeigeltD. SchertlJohn D. MonnierВ. П. ГрининK.-H. HofmannЛ. В. ТамбовцеваTim J. Harries
- Topics
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (32 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (31 papers)Astro and Planetary Science (18 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyAstronomy and Astrophysics
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Alexander Kreplin
32 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 385
- Spectroscopy 111
- Instrumentation 35
- Atmospheric Science 22
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 10
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Kreplin
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Kreplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Kreplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Kreplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Kreplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Kreplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Kreplin. The network helps show where Alexander Kreplin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Kreplin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Kreplin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Kreplin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Kreplin. Alexander Kreplin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Alexander Kreplin
Alexander Kreplin is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Spectroscopy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (32 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (31 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (385 citations), Instrumentation (35 citations) and Spectroscopy (111 citations). Alexander Kreplin has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Kraus, G. Weigelt, D. Schertl, John D. Monnier, В. П. Гринин, K.-H. Hofmann, Л. В. Тамбовцева, Tim J. Harries, Makoto Kishimoto and Claire L. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.