Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN
1967329 citationsWilliam A. Silverman, Alice G. Beard et al.PEDIATRICSprofile →
DISEASES OF THE NEWBORN
1961273 citationsAlexander J. SchafferThe American Journal of the Medical Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander J. Schaffer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander J. Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander J. Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander J. Schaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander J. Schaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander J. Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander J. Schaffer. The network helps show where Alexander J. Schaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander J. Schaffer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander J. Schaffer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander J. Schaffer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander J. Schaffer. Alexander J. Schaffer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Schaffer, Alexander J. & Rowland V. Rider. (2000). A note on the prognosis of pulmonary agenesis and hypoplasia according to the side affected.. PubMed. 68. 25–31; discussion 31.2 indexed citations
2.
Raiford, Kimberly L., et al.. (1994). CERAD part VII. Neurology. 44(11). 2208–2208.23 indexed citations
3.
Taeusch, H. William, Roberta A. Ballard, Mary Ellen Avery, & Alexander J. Schaffer. (1991). Schaffer and Avery's Diseases of the Newborn. Medical Entomology and Zoology.18 indexed citations
4.
Schaffer, Alexander J., et al.. (1984). Schaffer's diseases of the newborn. Saunders eBooks.28 indexed citations
Lucey, Jerold F., Marvin Cornblath, Stanley N. Graven, et al.. (1971). OXYGEN THERAPY IN THE NEWBORN INFANT. PEDIATRICS. 47(6). 1086–1087.9 indexed citations
7.
Lucey, Jerold F., Audrey K. Brown, Alice G. Beard, et al.. (1967). COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN. PEDIATRICS. 40(5). 923–923.2 indexed citations
8.
Silverman, William A., Alice G. Beard, Audrey K. Brown, et al.. (1967). COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN. PEDIATRICS. 39(6). 935–939.329 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Schaffer, Alexander J.. (1966). Diseases of the Newborn. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 251(3). 370–370.1 indexed citations
Schaffer, Alexander J.. (1961). Diseases of the Newborn. Southern Medical Journal. 54(6). 703–703.1 indexed citations
13.
Schaffer, Alexander J.. (1961). DISEASES OF THE NEWBORN. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 241(3). 411–411.273 indexed citations breakdown →
Schaffer, Alexander J.. (1956). The pathogenesis of intrauterine pneumonia. I. A critical review of the evidence concerning intrauterine respiratory-like movements.. PubMed. 17(5). 747–56.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.