Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The NGO Scramble: Organizational Insecurity and the Political Economy of Transnational Action
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Cooley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Cooley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Cooley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Cooley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Cooley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Cooley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Cooley. The network helps show where Alexander Cooley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Cooley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Cooley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Cooley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Cooley. Alexander Cooley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cooley, Alexander & Jack Snyder. (2015). Ranking the World. Cambridge University Press eBooks.95 indexed citations
7.
Cooley, Alexander & Jack Snyder. (2015). Rank has its privileges. Foreign Affairs. 94(6). 15.1 indexed citations
8.
Cooley, Alexander. (2015). New Silk Route or Classic Developmental Cul-de-Sac? The Prospects and Challenges of China’s OBOR Initiative. PonarsEuarasia - Policy Memos.4 indexed citations
9.
Cooley, Alexander. (2015). Russia and China in Central Asia. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).2 indexed citations
10.
Cooley, Alexander, Daniel H. Nexon, Benjamin de Carvalho, & Halvard Leira. (2015). Undermining Hegemony? Building a Framework for Goods Substitution. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).3 indexed citations
11.
Cooley, Alexander. (2012). Manas Matters: The Changing Politics of the U.S. Military Base in Kyrgyzstan. PonarsEuarasia - Policy Memos.1 indexed citations
12.
Cooley, Alexander. (2012). The New Great Game in Central Asia. Foreign Affairs.1 indexed citations
13.
Cooley, Alexander. (2012). The Stagnation of the SCO: Competing Agendas and Divergent Interests in Central Asia. PonarsEuarasia - Policy Memos.3 indexed citations
Cooley, Alexander. (2012). The Kyrgyz Crisis and the Political Logic of Central Asia's Weak Regional Security Organizations. PonarsEuarasia - Policy Memos.2 indexed citations
16.
Avant, Deborah, Allison Marston Danner, Aseem Prakash, et al.. (2010). Who Governs the Globe?. Cambridge University Press eBooks.255 indexed citations
Cooley, Alexander & Kimberly Marten. (2006). Base Motives. Armed Forces & Society. 32(4). 566–583.14 indexed citations
20.
Cooley, Alexander. (2005). Democratization and the Contested Politics of U.S. Military Bases in Korea. 10(2). 201–231.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.