This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Stein more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Stein. The network helps show where Alex Stein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alex Stein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alex Stein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alex Stein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alex Stein. Alex Stein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stein, Alex. (2018). Law and the Epistemology of Disagreements. Washington University law review. 96(1). 51–103.2 indexed citations
2.
Stein, Alex & Gideon Parchomovsky. (2017). Empowering Individual Plaintiffs. eYLS (Yale Law School).2 indexed citations
3.
Stein, Alex & Dov Fox. (2015). Dualism and Doctrine. Indiana law journal. 90(3). 975.1 indexed citations
4.
Allen, Ronald J. & Alex Stein. (2013). Evidence, Probability, and the Burden of Proof. 55(3). 557.11 indexed citations
5.
Parchomovsky, Gideon & Alex Stein. (2013). Intellectual Property Defenses. Columbia Law Review. 113(6). 1483.1 indexed citations
6.
Stein, Alex & Gideon Parchomovsky. (2012). The Relational Contingency of Rights. Virginia Law Review. 98(6). 1313.1 indexed citations
7.
Stein, Alex. (2012). Are People Probabilistically Challenged? Book Review of Daniel Kahneman, THINKING, FAST AND SLOW (2011). Michigan Law Review. 111.1 indexed citations
8.
Stein, Alex. (2012). Corrupt Intentions: Bribery, Unlawful Gratuity, and Honest-Services Fraud. Law and Contemporary Problems. 75(2). 61–81.5 indexed citations
9.
Stein, Alex. (2011). Toward a Theory of Medical Malpractice. Iowa law review. 97(4). 1201.2 indexed citations
10.
Stein, Alex. (2010). The Flawed Probabilistic Foundation of Law & Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal.
11.
Parchomovsky, Gideon & Alex Stein. (2010). The Distortionary Effect of Evidence on Primary Behavior. Harvard Law Review. 124(2). 518–548.
12.
Porat, Ariel & Alex Stein. (2009). Liability for Future Harm. SSRN Electronic Journal.23 indexed citations
13.
Stein, Alex. (2008). THE RIGHT TO SILENCE HELPS THE INNOCENT: A RESPONSE TO CRITICS. SSRN Electronic Journal. 30(3). 1115.2 indexed citations
14.
Stein, Alex, et al.. (2007). Deterrence, Retributivism, and the Law of Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
15.
Stein, Alex, et al.. (2007). Mediating Rules in Criminal Law. Virginia Law Review. 93(5). 1197.2 indexed citations
16.
Stein, Alex. (2006). Fixing Medical Torts by Repositioning Inalienability and Contract. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Stein, Alex & Uzi Segal. (2005). Ambiguity Aversion and the Criminal Process. The Notre Dame law review. 81(4). 1495.10 indexed citations
18.
Stein, Alex. (2001). Of Two Wrongs That Make a Right: Two Paradoxes of the Evidence Law and Their Combined Economic Justification. Texas law review. 79(5). 1199.3 indexed citations
19.
Stein, Alex. (1996). Allocating the Burden of Proof in Sales Litigation: The Law, Its Rationale, a New Theory, and Its Failure. University of Miami law review. 50(2). 335.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.