401 total citations 20 papers, 62 citations indexed
About
Alan Lenzi is a scholar working on Archeology, Religious studies and Social Psychology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Alan Lenzi has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 62 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Archeology, 7 papers in Religious studies and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Alan Lenzi's work include Ancient Near East History (10 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers) and Families in Therapy and Culture (5 papers). Alan Lenzi is often cited by papers focused on Ancient Near East History (10 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers) and Families in Therapy and Culture (5 papers). Alan Lenzi collaborates with scholars based in United States. Alan Lenzi's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Journal of the American Oriental Society and History of Religions.
In The Last Decade
Alan Lenzi
12 papers
receiving
47 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Lenzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Lenzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Lenzi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Lenzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Lenzi. The network helps show where Alan Lenzi may publish in the future.
Lenzi, Alan, et al.. (2017). Ludlul Bēl Nēmeqi: The Standard Babylonian Poem of the Righteous Sufferer. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific).2 indexed citations
Lenzi, Alan. (2016). Scribal Revision and Textual Variation in Akkadian Šuila-Prayers: Two Case Studies in Ritual Adaptation. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific). 63–108.2 indexed citations
8.
Lenzi, Alan. (2015). An Alternate Ending to an Akkadian Letter-Prayer to Amurrum (AbB 12, no. 99). Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific). 2015(4). 160–162.
9.
Lenzi, Alan. (2013). Advertising Secrecy, Creating Power in Ancient Mesopotamia: How Scholars Used Secrecy in Scribal Education to Bolster and Perpetuate Their Social Prestige and Power. Repositorio Institucional UCA (Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina). 11(11). 13–42.2 indexed citations
10.
Lenzi, Alan. (2013). A New Akkadian Shuila-Prayer to the Three Paths of Heaven and the Third Tablet of Bi-t sala-' mê. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific). 82(1). 1–10.1 indexed citations
11.
Lenzi, Alan. (2011). Reading Akkadian Prayers and Hymns: An Introduction. Repositorio Institucional UCA (Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina). 1–546.7 indexed citations
Lenzi, Alan. (2010). Šiptu ul Yuttun: Some Reflections on a Closing Formula in Akkadian Incantations. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific). 131–166.3 indexed citations
14.
Lenzi, Alan, et al.. (2010). Ludlul Bēl Nēmeqi.1 indexed citations
15.
Lenzi, Alan. (2009). Secrecy, Textual Legitimation, and Inter-Cultural Polemics in the Book of Daniel. The Catholic Biblical quarterly. 71(2). 330–348.2 indexed citations
Lenzi, Alan. (2008). Secrecy and the Gods: Secret Knowledge in Ancient Mesopotamia and Biblical Israel.. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific).22 indexed citations
Lenzi, Alan. (2006). Benjamin R. Foster, Before the Muses: An Anthology of Akkadian Literature, Third Edition. Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.