This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Freeman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Freeman. The network helps show where Alan Freeman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alan Freeman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alan Freeman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alan Freeman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alan Freeman. Alan Freeman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bakhshi, Hasan, J. G. Davies, Alan Freeman, & Peter L. Higgs. (2015). The geography of the UK's creative and high-tech economies. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).15 indexed citations
3.
Freeman, Alan. (2015). Introduction to Chris Freeman’s “Schumpeter’s ‘Business Cycles’ Revisited”. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 27. 37–46.1 indexed citations
4.
Freeman, Alan. (2010). What Causes Booms. MPRA Paper.2 indexed citations
5.
Freeman, Alan. (2008). The Poverty of Statistics. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).2 indexed citations
6.
Freeman, Alan. (2008). Culture, Creativity and Innovation in the Internet Age. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).4 indexed citations
7.
Freeman, Alan. (2004). Confronting the Evidence: Marx's Historians on the Falling Profit Rate. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).
8.
Freeman, Alan. (2004). London’s Creative Sector: 2004 Update. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.20 indexed citations
9.
Freeman, Alan. (2002). Marx After Marx After Sraffa. MPRA Paper.2 indexed citations
10.
Freeman, Alan. (2001). An Innovative Library Partnership.. Planning for higher education. 30(1). 20–26.3 indexed citations
11.
Freeman, Alan. (2000). MARXIAN DEBATES ON THE FALLING RATE OF PROFIT. MPRA Paper.
12.
Freeman, Alan. (1998). Time, the value of money and the quantification of value. MPRA Paper.2 indexed citations
13.
Freeman, Alan. (1994). Reappraising the classics - the case for a dynamic reformulation of the labour theory of value. MPRA Paper.1 indexed citations
14.
Freeman, Alan, et al.. (1992). Religion vs. the Public Schools: Losing Faith in Public Schools. Tikkun. 7(2). 31.2 indexed citations
15.
Freeman, Alan. (1991). National Accounts in Value Terms: The Social Wage and Profit Rate in Britain 1950-1986. MPRA Paper.6 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, Alan, et al.. (1989). Scratching the Belly of the Beast. Tikkun. 4(5). 161–178.
17.
Freeman, Alan, et al.. (1989). A Republican Agenda for Hobbesian America. Florida law review. 41(3). 581–622.1 indexed citations
Freeman, Alan, et al.. (1987). Religion as Science/Science as Religion: Constitutional Law and the Fundamentalist Challenge. Tikkun. 2(5). 64.1 indexed citations
20.
Freeman, Alan, et al.. (1987). The Public-Private Distinction in American Law and Life. Buffalo law review. 36(2). 237.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.