A.H. van Gelder

1.8k total citations
50 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

A.H. van Gelder is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, A.H. van Gelder has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 16 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 9 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in A.H. van Gelder's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (30 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers). A.H. van Gelder is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (30 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers). A.H. van Gelder collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Portugal and Germany. A.H. van Gelder's co-authors include J.W. Cone, G.J.W. Visscher, F. Driehuis, Alfons J. M. Stams, Herwig Bachmann, Diana Z. Sousa, M. M. Alves, Caroline M. Plugge, A.M. van Vuuren and V.A. Hindle and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Journal of Dairy Science.

In The Last Decade

A.H. van Gelder

50 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

A.H. van Gelder
A.H. van Gelder
Citations per year, relative to A.H. van Gelder A.H. van Gelder (= 1×) peers Takehiro Nishida

Countries citing papers authored by A.H. van Gelder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.H. van Gelder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.H. van Gelder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.H. van Gelder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.H. van Gelder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.H. van Gelder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.H. van Gelder. The network helps show where A.H. van Gelder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A.H. van Gelder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A.H. van Gelder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A.H. van Gelder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A.H. van Gelder. A.H. van Gelder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jeyaram, Kumaraswamy, Leo Lahti, Sebastian Tims, et al.. (2025). Fermented foods affect the seasonal stability of gut bacteria in an Indian rural population. Nature Communications. 16(1). 771–771. 5 indexed citations
2.
Timmers, Peer H. A., María Suárez‐Diez, Sjef Boeren, et al.. (2020). Comparative proteomics of Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA T in response to acetate, formate and/or hydrogen as electron donor. Environmental Microbiology. 23(1). 299–315. 30 indexed citations
3.
Pol, Arjan, Sepehr S. Mohammadi, A.H. van Gelder, et al.. (2020). The thermoacidophilic methanotroph Methylacidiphilum fumariolicum SolV oxidizes subatmospheric H2 with a high-affinity, membrane-associated [NiFe] hydrogenase. The ISME Journal. 14(5). 1223–1232. 43 indexed citations
4.
Sousa, Diana Z., Michael Visser, A.H. van Gelder, et al.. (2018). The deep-subsurface sulfate reducer Desulfotomaculum kuznetsovii employs two methanol-degrading pathways. Nature Communications. 9(1). 239–239. 36 indexed citations
5.
Gelder, A.H. van, et al.. (2018). Organic acid production from potato starch waste fermentation by rumen microbial communities from Dutch and Thai dairy cows. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 11(1). 13–13. 27 indexed citations
6.
Gelder, A.H. van, Diana Z. Sousa, W. Irene C. Rijpstra, et al.. (2014). Ercella succinigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic succinate-producing bacterium. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY. 64(Pt_7). 2449–2454. 26 indexed citations
7.
Gelder, A.H. van, et al.. (2011). 1,3‐Propanediol production from glycerol by a newly isolated Trichococcus strain. Microbial Biotechnology. 5(4). 573–578. 39 indexed citations
8.
Balk, Melike, Farrakh Mehboob, A.H. van Gelder, et al.. (2010). (Per)chlorate reduction by an acetogenic bacterium, Sporomusa sp., isolated from an underground gas storage. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 88(2). 595–603. 45 indexed citations
9.
Rodrigues, M.A.M., Cristina Guedes, Ana I. Rodrigues, et al.. (2008). Evaluation of the nutritive value of apple pulp mixed with different amounts of wheat straw. Livestock research for rural development. 20(1). 11 indexed citations
10.
Cone, J.W. & A.H. van Gelder. (2006). Adaptation of the rumen microbial population to native potato starch degradation determined with the gas production technique and the nylon bag technique. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 90(11-12). 511–518. 6 indexed citations
11.
Hindle, V.A., et al.. (2005). Site and extent of starch degradation in the dairy cow – a comparison between in vivo, in situ and in vitro measurements. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 89(3-6). 158–165. 37 indexed citations
12.
Bruinenberg, M.H., et al.. (2004). Estimating rumen degradability of forages from semi-natural grasslands, using nylon bag and gas production techniques. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 51(4). 351–368. 5 indexed citations
13.
Becker, P.M., A.H. van Gelder, P.G. van Wikselaar, A.W. Jongbloed, & J.W. Cone. (2003). Carbon balances for in vitro digestion and fermentation of potential roughages for pregnant sows. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 110(1-4). 159–174. 10 indexed citations
14.
Cone, J.W., et al.. (2002). Rumen escape protein in concentrate ingredients determined with the nylon bag and enzymatic techniques. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 97(3-4). 247–254. 12 indexed citations
15.
Cone, J.W., et al.. (1999). Different Techniques to Study Rumen Fermentation Characteristics of Maturing Grass and Grass Silage. Journal of Dairy Science. 82(5). 957–966. 47 indexed citations
16.
Blümmel, Michael, J.W. Cone, A.H. van Gelder, et al.. (1998). An automated and continuous in vitro gas production technique to describe the kinetics of roughage degradation. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 7. 25–25. 2 indexed citations
17.
Cone, J.W., A.H. van Gelder, & F. Driehuis. (1997). Description of gas production profiles with a three-phasic model. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 66(1-4). 31–45. 135 indexed citations
18.
Cone, J.W., et al.. (1996). Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 61(1-4). 113–128. 292 indexed citations
19.
Cone, J.W., A.H. van Gelder, & H.J.P. Marvin. (1994). The effect of different drying conditions on chemical composition, physical properties, organic matter digestibility and fermentation kinetics of grass and maize stems.. 1 indexed citations
20.
Cone, J.W., et al.. (1994). In vitro estimation of rumen fermentable organic matter using rumen fluid and a cell free preparation of rumen fluid. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science. 42(4). 343–356. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026