Agnès Tutin

1.1k total citations
41 papers, 261 citations indexed

About

Agnès Tutin is a scholar working on Philosophy, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Agnès Tutin has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 261 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Philosophy, 28 papers in Language and Linguistics and 16 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Agnès Tutin's work include Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (31 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (16 papers) and linguistics and terminology studies (13 papers). Agnès Tutin is often cited by papers focused on Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (31 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (16 papers) and linguistics and terminology studies (13 papers). Agnès Tutin collaborates with scholars based in France, Canada and Germany. Agnès Tutin's co-authors include Francis Grossmann, Dominique Legallois, Margarita Alonso Ramos, Richard Kittredge, Fanny Rinck, Max Silberztein, Constantin Orǎsan, Ruslan Mitkov, Gaétane Dostie and Maximin Coavoux and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Language Resources and Evaluation and World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Agnès Tutin

33 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

Agnès Tutin
Agnès Tutin
Citations per year, relative to Agnès Tutin Agnès Tutin (= 1×) peers Catherine Schnedecker

Countries citing papers authored by Agnès Tutin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Agnès Tutin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agnès Tutin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agnès Tutin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Agnès Tutin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Agnès Tutin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Agnès Tutin. The network helps show where Agnès Tutin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Agnès Tutin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Agnès Tutin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Agnès Tutin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Agnès Tutin. Agnès Tutin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tutin, Agnès. (2022). Comment dirais-je ? Que veux-tu ? Comment ça va ?. Lingvisticae Investigationes. 45(2). 172–196.
2.
Tutin, Agnès, et al.. (2018). Lexique transversal et formules discursives des sciences humaines. 11 indexed citations
5.
Tutin, Agnès, et al.. (2016). Présentation. Lidil. 53. 5–18. 2 indexed citations
7.
Tutin, Agnès, et al.. (2016). From binary collocations to grammatically extended collocations: Some insights in the semantic field of emotions in French.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 1 indexed citations
8.
Grossmann, Francis, et al.. (2009). Filiation et transfert d’objets scientifiques dans les écrits de recherche. Pratiques. 143-144. 187–202. 7 indexed citations
9.
Tutin, Agnès. (2008). For an extended definition of lexical collocations. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 0. 8 indexed citations
10.
Tutin, Agnès. (2007). Traitement sémantique par analyse distributionnelle des noms transdisciplinaires des écrits scientifiques. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 16(5). 283–292. 4 indexed citations
11.
Tutin, Agnès. (2007). Autour du lexique et de la phraséologie des écrits scientifiques. Revue française de linguistique appliquée. Vol. XII(2). 5–14. 23 indexed citations
12.
Tutin, Agnès, et al.. (2006). Esquisse de typologie des noms d'affect à partir de leurs propriétés combinatoires. Langue française. 150(2). 32–49.
13.
Silberztein, Max & Agnès Tutin. (2005). NooJ, un outil TAL pour l'enseignement des langues. Application pour l'étude de la morphologie lexicale en FLE. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. Vol. 8, n° 2. 123–134. 5 indexed citations
14.
Grossmann, Francis & Agnès Tutin. (2005). Présentation. Lidil. 32. 1 indexed citations
15.
Tutin, Agnès. (2005). Le dictionnaire de collocations est-il indispensable ?. Revue française de linguistique appliquée. Vol. X(2). 31–48. 11 indexed citations
16.
Tutin, Agnès, et al.. (2004). Annotation of anaphoric expressions in an aligned bilingual corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1 indexed citations
17.
Tutin, Agnès. (2004). Pour une modélisation dynamique des collocations dans les textes. 207–219. 6 indexed citations
18.
Tutin, Agnès, et al.. (2001). Pour informatiser le Dictionnaire universel de Basnage (1702) et de Trévoux (1704) : approche théorique et pratique. H. Champion eBooks. 2 indexed citations
19.
Tutin, Agnès, et al.. (1999). SGML pour l’informatisation des dictionnaires anciens : l’expérience du Dictionnaire Universel de Furetière revu par Basnage (1702). Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche). 38(1). 9–15.
20.
Ramos, Margarita Alonso & Agnès Tutin. (1993). Les Fonctions Lexicales du Dictionnaire Explicatif et Combinatoire Pour L'étude de la Cohésion Lexicale. Lingvisticae Investigationes. 17(1). 161–188. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026