Admos Chimhowu

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
24 papers, 923 citations indexed

About

Admos Chimhowu is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science and Urban Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Admos Chimhowu has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 923 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Soil Science and 9 papers in Urban Studies. Recurrent topics in Admos Chimhowu's work include Land Rights and Reforms (11 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (9 papers) and African studies and sociopolitical issues (6 papers). Admos Chimhowu is often cited by papers focused on Land Rights and Reforms (11 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (9 papers) and African studies and sociopolitical issues (6 papers). Admos Chimhowu collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Admos Chimhowu's co-authors include Phil Woodhouse, David Hulme, Jenifer Piesse, Lauchlan T. Munro, Philip Woodhouse, Ping Gao, Sara Feresu, Martin Prowse, Samuel Munzele Maimbo and Dilip Ratha and has published in prestigious journals such as World Development, Technological Forecasting and Social Change and Land Use Policy.

In The Last Decade

Admos Chimhowu

24 papers receiving 805 citations

Hit Papers

The ‘New’ national development planning and global develo... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 25 50 75 100

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Admos Chimhowu United States 13 374 362 272 186 132 24 923
Ann Whitehead United Kingdom 14 456 1.2× 314 0.9× 306 1.1× 126 0.7× 156 1.2× 32 1.1k
Michael Kevane United States 16 340 0.9× 334 0.9× 254 0.9× 92 0.5× 240 1.8× 53 1.1k
Leo de Haan Netherlands 17 382 1.0× 127 0.4× 220 0.8× 92 0.5× 387 2.9× 59 1.3k
An Ansoms Belgium 17 500 1.3× 162 0.4× 276 1.0× 48 0.3× 64 0.5× 63 940
Sam Moyo United Kingdom 23 1.1k 3.0× 784 2.2× 421 1.5× 188 1.0× 122 0.9× 59 1.6k
Shelley Feldman United States 18 467 1.2× 76 0.2× 192 0.7× 58 0.3× 151 1.1× 55 964
A. Haroon Akram‐Lodhi Canada 19 523 1.4× 285 0.8× 846 3.1× 35 0.2× 198 1.5× 61 1.4k
Grace Carswell United Kingdom 17 378 1.0× 152 0.4× 140 0.5× 53 0.3× 146 1.1× 36 908
Godfrey Bahiigwa Uganda 9 183 0.5× 186 0.5× 333 1.2× 40 0.2× 241 1.8× 16 871
Forhad Shilpi United States 18 525 1.4× 128 0.4× 181 0.7× 82 0.4× 468 3.5× 98 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Admos Chimhowu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Admos Chimhowu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Admos Chimhowu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Admos Chimhowu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Admos Chimhowu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Admos Chimhowu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Admos Chimhowu. The network helps show where Admos Chimhowu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Admos Chimhowu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Admos Chimhowu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Admos Chimhowu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Admos Chimhowu. Admos Chimhowu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chimhowu, Admos, David Hulme, & Lauchlan T. Munro. (2019). The ‘New’ national development planning and global development goals: Processes and partnerships. World Development. 120. 76–89. 116 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Gao, Ping, et al.. (2019). ICTs in the transformation of rural enterprises in China: A multi-layer perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 145. 12–23. 44 indexed citations
3.
Chimhowu, Admos. (2018). The ‘new’ African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm. Land Use Policy. 81. 897–903. 128 indexed citations
4.
Chimhowu, Admos. (2013). Aid for agriculture and rural development in the global south: A changing landscape with new players and challenges. Econstor (Econstor). 2 indexed citations
5.
Chimhowu, Admos, et al.. (2012). Understanding Poverty, Promoting Wellbeing and Sustainable Development:: A Sample Survey of 16 Districts in Zimbabwe. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 11 indexed citations
6.
Chimhowu, Admos, et al.. (2010). Moving Forward in Zimbabwe: Reducing poverty and promoting growth. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 39 indexed citations
7.
Chimhowu, Admos & Philip Woodhouse. (2010). Forbidden But Not Suppressed: a ‘Vernacular’ Land Market in Svosve Communal Lands, Zimbabwe. Africa. 80(1). 14–35. 12 indexed citations
8.
Chimhowu, Admos & Philip Woodhouse. (2008). Communal Tenure and Rural Poverty: Land Transactions in Svosve Communal Area, Zimbabwe. Development and Change. 39(2). 285–308. 23 indexed citations
9.
Prowse, Martin & Admos Chimhowu. (2007). Making agriculture work for the poor. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University). 1–4. 10 indexed citations
10.
Chimhowu, Admos & David Hulme. (2006). Livelihood dynamics in planned and spontaneous resettlement in Zimbabwe: Converging and Vulnerable. World Development. 34(4). 728–750. 56 indexed citations
11.
Chimhowu, Admos. (2006). Tinkering on the Fringes? Redistributive Land Reforms and Chronic Poverty in Southern Africa, CPRC Working Paper No. 58. 7 indexed citations
12.
Chimhowu, Admos & Phil Woodhouse. (2006). Customary vs Private Property Rights? Dynamics and Trajectories of Vernacular Land Markets in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change. 6(3). 346–371. 219 indexed citations
13.
Chimhowu, Admos, et al.. (2005). Remittances: development impact and future prospects. World Bank Publications. 149 indexed citations
14.
Chimhowu, Admos, Philip Woodhouse, & Uma Kothari. (2005). Development Studies, Nature and Natural Resources: Changing Narratives and Discursive Practices. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 4 indexed citations
15.
Chimhowu, Admos & Phil Woodhouse. (2005). Vernacular Land Markets and the Changing Face of Customary Land Tenure in Africa. Forum for Development Studies. 32(2). 385–414. 10 indexed citations
16.
Chimhowu, Admos, et al.. (2005). Socio-economic Impact of Remittances on Poverty Reduction?. Research Portal (King's College London). 83–102. 20 indexed citations
17.
Chimhowu, Admos, et al.. (2004). The Impact of Remittances on Poverty in Developing Countries. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 19 indexed citations
18.
Chimhowu, Admos, et al.. (2002). Urban Solid Waste Management in Zimbabwe. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1 indexed citations
19.
Chimhowu, Admos & Daniel Tevera. (1998). Urban Growth, Poverty and Backyard Shanties in Harare, Zimbabwe. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 29(29). 11–22. 7 indexed citations
20.
Chimhowu, Admos & Daniel Tevera. (1991). Intra-Provincial Inequalities In The Provision Of Health Care In The Midlands Province Of Zimbabwe. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies). 33–45. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026