Adam Savitt

678 total citations
10 papers, 495 citations indexed

About

Adam Savitt is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam Savitt has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 495 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Adam Savitt's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (3 papers). Adam Savitt is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (3 papers). Adam Savitt collaborates with scholars based in United States. Adam Savitt's co-authors include Ruben C. Gur, Tyler M. Moore, Raquel E. Gur, Monica E. Calkins, Kosha Ruparel, Warren B. Bilker, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Håkon Håkonarson, Allison M. Port and Elaine H. Zackai and has published in prestigious journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Molecular Psychiatry and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Adam Savitt

10 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Adam Savitt

PMH

ECP

GENET

Letizia Squarcina Italy

Michio Fukumizu Japan

Dhruman D. Goradia United States

Letícia Sanguinetti Czepielewski Brazil

Clara Alloza United Kingdom

Prapti Gautam United States

Weicong Lu China

Yoonho Chung United States

Catherine Diaz‐Asper United States

Sheena I. Dev United States

Letizia Squarcina Italy

Adam Savitt

272 ×1.5

153 ×1.1

PMH

62 ×0.5

85 ×0.8

ECP

41 ×0.5

GENET

Citations per year, relative to Adam Savitt Adam Savitt (= 1×) peers Letizia Squarcina

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Savitt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Savitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Savitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Savitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Savitt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Savitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Savitt. The network helps show where Adam Savitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Savitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Savitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Savitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Savitt. Adam Savitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Moore, Tyler M., Ruben C. Gur, Michael L. Thomas, et al.. (2017). Development, Administration, and Structural Validity of a Brief, Computerized Neurocognitive Battery: Results From the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers. Assessment. 26(1). 125–143. 23 indexed citations

Moore, Tyler M., Steven P. Reise, David R. Roalf, et al.. (2016). Development of an itemwise efficiency scoring method: Concurrent, convergent, discriminant, and neuroimaging-based predictive validity assessed in a large community sample.. Psychological Assessment. 28(12). 1529–1542. 7 indexed citations

Tang, Sunny X., Tyler M. Moore, Monica E. Calkins, et al.. (2016). The Psychosis Spectrum in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Is Comparable to That of Nondeleted Youths. Biological Psychiatry. 82(1). 17–25. 40 indexed citations

Moore, Tyler M., J. Cobb Scott, Steven P. Reise, et al.. (2015). Development of an abbreviated form of the Penn Line Orientation Test using large samples and computerized adaptive test simulation.. Psychological Assessment. 27(3). 955–964. 32 indexed citations

Yi, James, Monica E. Calkins, Sunny X. Tang, et al.. (2015). Impact of Psychiatric Comorbidity and Cognitive Deficit on Function in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 76(10). e1262–e1270. 18 indexed citations

Basner, Mathias, Adam Savitt, Tyler M. Moore, et al.. (2015). Development and Validation of the Cognition Test Battery for Spaceflight. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance. 86(11). 942–952. 106 indexed citations

Leary, Marion, Emily Esposito, Kosha Ruparel, et al.. (2014). Feasibility of Cognitive Functional Assessment in Cardiac Arrest Survivors Using an Abbreviated Laptop-Based Neurocognitive Battery. Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management. 4(3). 131–136. 8 indexed citations

Gur, Raquel E., James Yi, Donna M. McDonald‐McGinn, et al.. (2014). Neurocognitive development in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: comparison with youth having developmental delay and medical comorbidities. Molecular Psychiatry. 19(11). 1205–1211. 72 indexed citations

Keutmann, Michael K., Samantha L. Moore‐Berg, Adam Savitt, & Ruben C. Gur. (2014). Generating an item pool for translational social cognition research: Methodology and initial validation. Behavior Research Methods. 47(1). 228–234. 10 indexed citations

10.

Gur, Ruben C., Monica E. Calkins, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, et al.. (2014). Neurocognitive Growth Charting in Psychosis Spectrum Youths. JAMA Psychiatry. 71(4). 366–366. 179 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact