Adam M. Meier

651 total citations
11 papers, 412 citations indexed

About

Adam M. Meier is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam M. Meier has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 412 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Adam M. Meier's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (6 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (4 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers). Adam M. Meier is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (6 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (4 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers). Adam M. Meier collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Adam M. Meier's co-authors include Emanuel Knill, D. Leibfried, Kenneth R. Brown, Yves Colombe, C. Ospelkaus, A. C. Wilson, D. J. Wineland, Jeff S. Wesner, Mark C. Belk and Eric J. Billman and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and British Journal of Anaesthesia.

In The Last Decade

Adam M. Meier

10 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Adam M. Meier United States 6 313 262 41 33 31 11 412
Massoud Borhani Switzerland 7 146 0.5× 399 1.5× 161 3.9× 14 0.4× 4 0.1× 9 428
Michael Streif Germany 10 190 0.6× 137 0.5× 22 0.5× 50 1.5× 20 300
Stefan Frick Austria 8 236 0.8× 226 0.9× 81 2.0× 3 0.1× 3 0.1× 17 326
M. Acton United States 8 231 0.7× 249 1.0× 9 0.2× 14 0.4× 8 488
Li-zhen Jiang China 10 374 1.2× 345 1.3× 25 0.6× 14 0.4× 44 434
Alexander Papageorge United States 6 115 0.4× 193 0.7× 35 0.9× 5 0.2× 8 227
Wan‐Ting He China 9 126 0.4× 134 0.5× 28 0.7× 2 0.1× 2 0.1× 25 200
Laura Jayne Wright United Kingdom 5 147 0.5× 210 0.8× 114 2.8× 1 0.0× 30 1.0× 8 298
Suso Kraut Germany 8 11 0.0× 101 0.4× 6 0.1× 5 0.2× 4 0.1× 8 396
Zhoudunming Tu United States 8 42 0.1× 72 0.3× 5 0.1× 25 0.8× 27 240

Countries citing papers authored by Adam M. Meier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam M. Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam M. Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam M. Meier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam M. Meier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam M. Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam M. Meier. The network helps show where Adam M. Meier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam M. Meier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam M. Meier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam M. Meier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam M. Meier. Adam M. Meier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Egan, Talmage D., Ken B. Johnson, Nathan L. Pace, et al.. (2023). Progress towards MAC-amnesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 130(2). e396–e396. 3 indexed citations
2.
Gard, Bryan & Adam M. Meier. (2022). Classically efficient quantum scalable Fermi-Hubbard benchmark. Physical review. A. 105(4). 4 indexed citations
3.
Stecher, Chad, Maya B. Mathur, David A. Cleveland, et al.. (2022). Plant-based default nudges effectively increase the sustainability of catered meals on college campuses: Three randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 6. 9 indexed citations
4.
Sawyer, Brian C., Adam M. Meier, Jan‐Karl Burkhardt, et al.. (2021). High-Fidelity Bell-State Preparation with Ca+40 Optical Qubits. Physical Review Letters. 127(13). 107 indexed citations
6.
Meier, Adam M., et al.. (2019). Testing the robustness of robust phase estimation. Physical review. A. 100(5). 3 indexed citations
7.
Campbell, Dan H., et al.. (2016). Command and Control, Cyber, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (CRISR) and Cyber Tactical Measures.
8.
Meier, Adam M., Bryan Eastin, & Emanuel Knill. (2013). Magic-state distillation with the four-qubit code. Quantum Information and Computation. 13(3&4). 195–209. 29 indexed citations
9.
Gaebler, John, Adam M. Meier, Ting Rei Tan, et al.. (2012). Randomized Benchmarking of Multiqubit Gates. Physical Review Letters. 108(26). 260503–260503. 72 indexed citations
10.
Wesner, Jeff S., Eric J. Billman, Adam M. Meier, & Mark C. Belk. (2011). Morphological convergence during pregnancy among predator and nonpredator populations of the livebearing fishBrachyrhaphis rhabdophora(Teleostei: Poeciliidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 104(2). 386–392. 45 indexed citations
11.
Brown, Kenneth R., A. C. Wilson, Yves Colombe, et al.. (2011). Single-qubit-gate error below104in a trapped ion. Physical Review A. 84(3). 138 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026