Adam E. Smith

2.3k total citations
51 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Adam E. Smith is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Biomaterials. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam E. Smith has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Organic Chemistry, 20 papers in Molecular Biology and 12 papers in Biomaterials. Recurrent topics in Adam E. Smith's work include Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (19 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (11 papers) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (8 papers). Adam E. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (19 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (11 papers) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (8 papers). Adam E. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Adam E. Smith's co-authors include Charles L. McCormick, Xuewei Xu, Theresa M. Reineke, Giovanna Grandinetti, Stacey E. Kirkland, Sean T. Hemp, Daniel A. Savin, John H. O’Haver, Steven P. Stodghill and Timothy E. Long and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, ACS Nano and Progress in Polymer Science.

In The Last Decade

Adam E. Smith

49 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Adam E. Smith United States 21 1.2k 511 498 363 341 51 2.0k
Ralf Weberskirch Germany 29 1.7k 1.4× 543 1.1× 479 1.0× 198 0.5× 491 1.4× 75 2.4k
Bryn D. Monnery Belgium 20 853 0.7× 356 0.7× 706 1.4× 189 0.5× 182 0.5× 29 1.6k
Matthias Hartlieb Germany 30 1.3k 1.2× 541 1.1× 735 1.5× 248 0.7× 461 1.4× 78 2.2k
Sivanand S. Pennadam United Kingdom 12 838 0.7× 361 0.7× 681 1.4× 345 1.0× 352 1.0× 13 1.9k
David A. Fulton United Kingdom 29 1.4k 1.2× 708 1.4× 552 1.1× 242 0.7× 599 1.8× 65 2.4k
Aasheesh Srivastava India 29 655 0.6× 547 1.1× 836 1.7× 323 0.9× 661 1.9× 82 2.3k
Agnieszka Kowalczuk Poland 20 552 0.5× 308 0.6× 309 0.6× 193 0.5× 222 0.7× 53 1.1k
Irina Astafieva United States 11 957 0.8× 336 0.7× 418 0.8× 290 0.8× 234 0.7× 14 1.6k
Colin Bonduelle France 24 1.3k 1.1× 1.0k 2.0× 1.1k 2.2× 343 0.9× 437 1.3× 62 2.4k
Hannah Lomas Australia 19 1.0k 0.9× 528 1.0× 799 1.6× 662 1.8× 532 1.6× 33 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Adam E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam E. Smith. The network helps show where Adam E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam E. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam E. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam E. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam E. Smith. Adam E. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Salmankhani, Azam, et al.. (2025). Molecular Simulation of CO2/CH4 Transport and Separation in Polystyrene-block-poly(ethylene oxide)/Ionic Liquid (IL) Membranes: Insights into Nanoconfined IL Effects. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 17(7). 11348–11361. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bentley, John P., et al.. (2024). Glycopolymeric Nanoparticles Block Breast Cancer Growth by Inhibiting Efferocytosis in the Tumor Microenvironment. ACS Applied Nano Materials. 7(24). 28851–28863. 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Mohammad, Sk Arif, Joshua A. Anderson, Sandeep K. Misra, et al.. (2024). Glycopolymeric Nanoparticles Enrich Less Immunogenic Protein Coronas, Reduce Mononuclear Phagocyte Clearance, and Improve Tumor Delivery Compared to PEGylated Nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 18(44). 30540–30560. 12 indexed citations
6.
Mohammad, Sk Arif, et al.. (2022). Comparative Investigation of the Hydrolysis of Charge‐Shifting Polymers Derived from an Azlactone‐Based Polymer. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 43(24). e2200420–e2200420. 2 indexed citations
7.
Mohammad, Sk Arif, Eric W. Roth, Karan Arora, et al.. (2022). Dual-Responsive Glycopolymers for Intracellular Codelivery of Antigen and Lipophilic Adjuvants. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 19(12). 4705–4716. 11 indexed citations
8.
Mishra, Sushil K., Christine M. Hamadani, Eric W. Roth, et al.. (2022). ROS‐Responsive Glycopolymeric Nanoparticles for Enhanced Drug Delivery to Macrophages. Macromolecular Bioscience. 22(12). e2200281–e2200281. 11 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Adam E., et al.. (2020). Interfacial vs Bulk Phenomena Effects on the Surface Tensions of Aqueous Magnetic Surfactants in Uniform Magnetic Fields. Langmuir. 36(34). 10074–10081. 6 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Adam E., et al.. (2020). Immunostimulatory biomaterials to boost tumor immunogenicity. Biomaterials Science. 8(20). 5516–5537. 15 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Adam E., et al.. (2019). Stability of Ionic Magnetic Surfactants in Aqueous Solutions: Measurement Techniques and Impact on Magnetic Processes. Langmuir. 35(36). 11843–11849. 12 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Adam E., et al.. (2019). Preparation of Neutrally-charged, pH-responsive Polymeric Nanoparticles for Cytosolic siRNA Delivery. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 1 indexed citations
13.
O’Haver, John H., et al.. (2017). Effect of Oxygen and Initiator Solubility on Admicellar Polymerization of Styrene on Silica Surfaces. International Journal of Polymer Science. 2017. 1–7. 11 indexed citations
14.
Brooks, Tracy A., et al.. (2017). RAFT Polymerization for the Synthesis of Tertiary Amine‐Based Diblock Copolymer Nucleic Acid Delivery Vehicles. Macromolecular Bioscience. 17(12). 6 indexed citations
15.
Wu, Yaoying, Adam E. Smith, & Theresa M. Reineke. (2017). Lipophilic Polycation Vehicles Display High Plasmid DNA Delivery to Multiple Cell Types. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 28(8). 2035–2040. 12 indexed citations
16.
Hemp, Sean T., et al.. (2014). RAFT polymerization of temperature- and salt-responsive block copolymers as reversible hydrogels. Polymer. 55(10). 2325–2331. 20 indexed citations
17.
Hickson, DeMarc A., Ana V. Diez Roux, Adam E. Smith, et al.. (2011). Associations of Fast Food Restaurant Availability With Dietary Intake and Weight Among African Americans in the Jackson Heart Study, 2000–2004. American Journal of Public Health. 101(S1). S301–S309. 47 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Adam E., et al.. (2010). The slow cell death response when screening chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 68(3). 795–803. 15 indexed citations
19.
Yuan, Hushan, Mônica Tallarico Pupo, Adam E. Smith, et al.. (2009). A stabilized demethoxyviridin derivative inhibits PI3 kinase. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 19(15). 4223–4227. 7 indexed citations
20.
Cortez‐Retamozo, Virna, Filip K. Świrski, Peter Waterman, et al.. (2008). Real-time assessment of inflammation and treatment response in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 118(12). 4058–4066. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026