Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
STUDIES ON THE MECHANISMS OF HYPERSENSITIVITY PHENOMENA
1964576 citationsLawrence M. Lichtenstein, Abraham G. OslerThe Journal of Experimental Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Abraham G. Osler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Abraham G. Osler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abraham G. Osler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abraham G. Osler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Abraham G. Osler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abraham G. Osler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abraham G. Osler. The network helps show where Abraham G. Osler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Abraham G. Osler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Abraham G. Osler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Abraham G. Osler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Abraham G. Osler. Abraham G. Osler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Diggs, Carter L. & Abraham G. Osler. (1969). Humoral immunity in rodent malaria. I. Estimation of parasitemia by electronic particle counting.. PubMed. 102(2). 292–7.12 indexed citations
3.
Siraganian, Reuben P., Antonio Secchi, & Abraham G. Osler. (1968). The Allergic Response of Rabbit Platelets. The Journal of Immunology. 101(6). 1130–1139.6 indexed citations
4.
Siraganian, Reuben P., Antonio Secchi, & Abraham G. Osler. (1968). The allergic response of rabbit platelets. II. Dependence on magnesium.. PubMed. 101(6). 1140–7.5 indexed citations
5.
Siraganian, Reuben P., Antonio Secchi, & Abraham G. Osler. (1968). The Allergic Response of Rabbit Platelets. The Journal of Immunology. 101(6). 1148–1153.4 indexed citations
6.
Hirose, Shun‐ichi & Abraham G. Osler. (1967). Interaction of rheumatoid factors with urea-denatured human gamma-globulin and its subunits.. PubMed. 98(3). 628–37.6 indexed citations
Levy, David A. & Abraham G. Osler. (1967). Studies on the mechanisms of hypersensitivity phenomena. XVI. In vitro assays of reaginic activity in human sera: effect of therapeutic immunization on seasonal titer changes.. PubMed. 99(6). 1068–77.77 indexed citations
Hirose, Shun‐ichi & Abraham G. Osler. (1965). INTERACTION OF RHEUMATOID FACTORS WITH AGGREGATED SUBUNITS OF HUMAN GAMMA-GLOBULIN.. PubMed. 94. 927–37.9 indexed citations
14.
Lichtenstein, Lawrence M. & Abraham G. Osler. (1964). STUDIES ON THE MECHANISMS OF HYPERSENSITIVITY PHENOMENA. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 120(4). 507–530.576 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Neu, Harold C., et al.. (1961). Studies on the mechanism of hypersensitivity phenomena. IV. An isometric smooth muscle assay system.. PubMed. 4. 388–400.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.