Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Social and Psychological Burden of Dysphagia: Its Impact on Diagnosis and Treatment
2002623 citationsOlle Ekberg, Shaheen Hamdy et al.Dysphagiaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by A Wuttge-Hannig
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of A Wuttge-Hannig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Wuttge-Hannig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Wuttge-Hannig more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Wuttge-Hannig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Wuttge-Hannig. The network helps show where A Wuttge-Hannig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Wuttge-Hannig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Wuttge-Hannig.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Wuttge-Hannig based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A Wuttge-Hannig. A Wuttge-Hannig is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Hannig, Christian, A Wuttge-Hannig, & Ernst J. Rummeny. (2007). Motilitätsstörungen des Ösophagus. Der Radiologe. 47(2). 123–136.1 indexed citations
Ekberg, Olle, Shaheen Hamdy, Virginie Woisard, A Wuttge-Hannig, & Primitivo Ortega. (2002). Social and Psychological Burden of Dysphagia: Its Impact on Diagnosis and Treatment. Dysphagia. 17(2). 139–146.623 indexed citations breakdown →
Wuttge-Hannig, A, et al.. (1998). [Roentgen cinematography assessment of normal values of pharyngeal motility as a principle in diagnosis of pathologic changes].. PubMed. 51(4). 141–9.1 indexed citations
Hannig, Christian, et al.. (1996). [Evaluation of velopharyngeal closure in preoperative planning of maxillary advancement].. PubMed. 49(2). 25–6.6 indexed citations
10.
Hannig, Christian, et al.. (1995). [Analysis and radiologic staging of the type and severity of aspiration].. PubMed. 35(10). 741–6.9 indexed citations
11.
Wuttge-Hannig, A, et al.. (1990). [Contribution of roentgen cinematography to the diagnosis of pharyngo-esophageal diseases].. PubMed. 31(2). 94–105.1 indexed citations
12.
Hannig, Christian, et al.. (1989). [Functional and morphological changes in the pharynx in achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm].. PubMed. 29(8). 363–70.1 indexed citations
Hannig, Christian & A Wuttge-Hannig. (1987). [Roentgen diagnosis of motility disorders of the pharynx and esophagus].. PubMed. 17(1). 7–17.1 indexed citations
15.
Hannig, Christian, et al.. (1987). [Detection of a higher incidence of pathologic somatic findings in globus sensation by use of high frequency cinematography].. PubMed. 35(7). 296–301.3 indexed citations
16.
Wuttge-Hannig, A, et al.. (1987). [Status of high-frequency roentgen cinematography in the diagnosis of the pharynx and esophagus].. PubMed. 40(10). 358–77.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.